<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1st Quarter 2008 GDP: +0.6%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122047</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122047</guid>
		<description>#7, don't know. I don't remember seeing big govt. step-ups in the BLS numbers, but I haven't looked closely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#7, don&#8217;t know. I don&#8217;t remember seeing big govt. step-ups in the BLS numbers, but I haven&#8217;t looked closely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dscott</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122046</link>
		<dc:creator>dscott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122046</guid>
		<description>Tom, do you have a link on government/public service sector employment?  The thread at NB on 22 million government jobs and their growth in employment has me thinking.  The USA Today article seems fishy.  It seems like they are laying the groundwork to explain away either an downtick in unemployment or a no change in unemployment report on Friday.  I think we need to beat them to the punch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, do you have a link on government/public service sector employment?  The thread at NB on 22 million government jobs and their growth in employment has me thinking.  The USA Today article seems fishy.  It seems like they are laying the groundwork to explain away either an downtick in unemployment or a no change in unemployment report on Friday.  I think we need to beat them to the punch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122045</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122045</guid>
		<description>#5, true that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5, true that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasty, Brutish &#38; Short</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122041</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasty, Brutish &#38; Short</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122041</guid>
		<description>What drives me nuts is that even if it had showed first quarter negative growth, we still wouldn't "be in a recession."  But of course, that's what all the headlines would have been: "Recession!!!!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What drives me nuts is that even if it had showed first quarter negative growth, we still wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;be in a recession.&#8221;  But of course, that&#8217;s what all the headlines would have been: &#8220;Recession!!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122040</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122040</guid>
		<description>#1, your sustainable growth point is also relevant to why oil is $117 or whatever but we can't drill for anything.

#2, ADP says +10,000, FWIW, which typically hasn't been much.

The big question is whether or not the total number of adults in the household survey will somehow keep going down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1, your sustainable growth point is also relevant to why oil is $117 or whatever but we can&#8217;t drill for anything.</p>
<p>#2, ADP says +10,000, FWIW, which typically hasn&#8217;t been much.</p>
<p>The big question is whether or not the total number of adults in the household survey will somehow keep going down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NixGuy.com &#187; Part of Ohio is in a Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122039</link>
		<dc:creator>NixGuy.com &#187; Part of Ohio is in a Recession</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122039</guid>
		<description>[...] Tom notes that nationwide, we are officially still not in a recession.Â  Which makes sense to me.Â  I remember [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Tom notes that nationwide, we are officially still not in a recession.Â  Which makes sense to me.Â  I remember [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dscott</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122038</link>
		<dc:creator>dscott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122038</guid>
		<description>Now we eagerly await the unemployment stats: "The Employment Situation for April 2008 is scheduled to be released on Friday, May 2, at 8:30 A.M. (EDT)."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we eagerly await the unemployment stats: &#8220;The Employment Situation for April 2008 is scheduled to be released on Friday, May 2, at 8:30 A.M. (EDT).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dscott</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122037</link>
		<dc:creator>dscott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/30/1st-quarter-2008-gdp/#comment-122037</guid>
		<description>Woohoo, no negative quarter and more importantly, no negative number under the imports.  Negative GDP Import numbers are historically a leading indicator of recession.

Housing has been negative since the 1st qtr of 2006 which is to be expected until housing inventories come down to match demand.    

My only concern is both the negative goods sector.  

Tom, the Dems are always going to find something to whine about.  I say, let's throw something back in their faces, they have advocated for years the idea of sustainable growth or low growth, they got what they asked for.  What are they complaining about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo, no negative quarter and more importantly, no negative number under the imports.  Negative GDP Import numbers are historically a leading indicator of recession.</p>
<p>Housing has been negative since the 1st qtr of 2006 which is to be expected until housing inventories come down to match demand.    </p>
<p>My only concern is both the negative goods sector.  </p>
<p>Tom, the Dems are always going to find something to whine about.  I say, let&#8217;s throw something back in their faces, they have advocated for years the idea of sustainable growth or low growth, they got what they asked for.  What are they complaining about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
