May 8, 2008

AP’s Crutsinger ‘Clings to Recession’ Despite Improving Data

The Associated Press’s business writers just won’t let go of their claim (or is it audacious hope?) that we are in a recession — not heading towards one, but actually in one.

Wednesday, despite yet another decent economic report, this one on productivity, the AP’s Martin Crutsinger downplayed a significant beating of expectations, and continued to invoke the R-word (bolds are mine):

Worker productivity rose by a better-than-expected amount in the first three months of the year while labor cost pressures eased.

The Labor Department reported Wednesday that productivity, the amount of output per hour of work, increased at an annual rate of 2.2 percent in the first quarter. That was slightly higher than the 1.5 percent increase that had been expected.

Analysts read the bigger-than-expected rise in productivity and the smaller increase in unit labor costs as a good sign that inflation pressures, at least on the labor front, are remaining under control and the country is not facing the danger of a wage-price spiral.

….. Many analysts think the country has already toppled into a recession. But overall economic growth, as measured by the gross domestic product, eked out a tiny 0.6 percent rate of increase in the first three months of the year, the same anemic pace as the final three months of last year.

I did the math just to make sure — 2.2% is 47% higher than 1.5%. Additionally, the 2.2% first-quarter performance was higher than the 1.8% reported for the fourth quarter of 2007, while expectations were that it would come in lower. “Slightly,” schmightly, Martin.

Consider the other economic news of the past week that Crutsinger had to blow past with his assertion that “many (unnamed) analysts” think that the US has “already toppled into a recession”:

  • The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Index released a week ago, covering about 15% of the economy — contracting, but barely, and holding steady.
  • Last Friday’s Employment report — Unemployment rate down to 5.0%, seasonally adjusted job losses smaller than previous months.
  • ISM’s Non-Manufacturing index, covering the remaining 85% of the economy, including the troubled housing and financial-services sectors — Moved significantly into expansion mode in April, blowing away expectations that it would further slip into contraction.

Topping all of that, the ISM issued its Spring Semiannual Economic Forecast Tuesday. The press release for the report had these headlines:

ISMeconPredix0508

The weighted average of the expected 1% increase in manufacturing revenues and the 2.7% increase in non-manufacturing is about 2.4%. That’s not spectacular growth by any stretch, but it’s a far cry from negative growth.

Yet the AP’s Crutsinger and his unnamed analysts continue to “cling to recession.” Excuse me for believing that he, his business-reporting co-workers at AP, and their oft-unnamed agenda-driven “analysts” will continue their clinging until, oh, about early November.

Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org.

__________________________________________

UPDATE: Reuters looked at the ISM’s Spring Semiannual Economic Forecast and (of course) decided that the weak figure relating to 15% of the economy was more important than the better one about the other 85%. So this is the headline — “US Factory Growth Seen ‘Marginal’ in 2008: ISM.”

6 Comments

  1. All we need is a D in the whitehouse and we’ll have all the good news on the economy they can find.

    :)

    Comment by Lord Nazh — May 8, 2008 @ 12:14 pm

  2. Recession…

    At least if Obamessiah wins the Presidency we’ll start to get good news from the MSM on the economy (regardless of the actual numbers). Just look at today compared to ‘96 heh…

    Trackback by the Daily Ramble — May 8, 2008 @ 12:20 pm

  3. Your first bullet reads “The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Index released a week ago, covering about 85% of the economy…”

    I believe that should be 15%.

    NED

    Comment by NewEnglandDevil — May 8, 2008 @ 3:54 pm

  4. Here is a trailing barometer of economic activity: charities. http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/apr/08/givings_down_at_charities36435/

    United Way’s 1,350 affiliates, which together form the largest nonprofit in the country, typically don’t see a drop in giving until well after a recession begins, Belous said.

    It takes an extended period of hardship before people decide they can no longer help out. And many wait until the end of the year to give money, so if a recession begins earlier in the year, the organization doesn’t realize it has lost support until later, he said.

    The MSM doesn’t report on it much but I think is a useful anecdotal guage of disposable income. Also one needs to factor in this is a major national election year, I have to wonder if with all those millions of dollars flowing into the Politician’s money box if a significant portion was diverted from charities???? I know PBS contributions are down in my area.

    Comment by dscott — May 8, 2008 @ 4:10 pm

  5. #3, you are correct. Thanks. Fixed at NB, too. It’s hard to get good help these days. :–>

    Comment by TBlumer — May 8, 2008 @ 4:28 pm

  6. Following up on that line of thinking political campaign giving diverting money from giving to charities: Is giving money a zero sum game, well someone thinks so but it seems anecdotal since no references are given?
    http://mercyman53.wordpress.com/2008/02/10/political-contributions-are-robbing-charities-and-churches/

    internet search results are really sparce on the issue.

    Comment by dscott — May 8, 2008 @ 4:34 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.