<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Couldn&#8217;t Help But Comment (050908)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/09/couldnt-help-but-comment-050908/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/09/couldnt-help-but-comment-050908/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:19:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dscott</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/09/couldnt-help-but-comment-050908/comment-page-1/#comment-122180</link>
		<dc:creator>dscott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/09/couldnt-help-but-comment-050908/#comment-122180</guid>
		<description>Oh, come on Tom, from the lib&#039;s point of view, the economy is in recession and has been since W took office.   As I have noted elsewhere before, whether it be Air America (radio), the media or print, all of these lib dominated groups are in ratings decline because their product is not what the public wants to buy.  I would submit the success of the internet news outlets have more to do with the failed business model of ceaseless propaganda from the print and media than anything else.  The consumer seeks out alternate product when the price is too high or the quality is too poor, it&#039;s called value.  The day the MSM drops the propagandizing and actually reports the news accurately is the day you and I will be writing to a non-existent audience.  In this we have job security because the libs won&#039;t change their behavior because the financial consequences aren&#039;t their concern.  The NYT will sell the assertion to support the agenda until the last employee turns off the lights as they are walking out the door for the very last time.  Air America is the example of this propaganda effort.  The only reason it survives is because Mark and Stephen Green are bankrolling the sales effort.  In doing so they get an illegal tax deduction under the guise of a business write off since you can&#039;t deduct political contributions (free positive air time) for their infomercials supporting the Dem party.  The Greens aren&#039;t stupid, they made the money in the first place and they are spending it in the most cost effective manner possible to advance the liberal agenda.  Sulzberger isn&#039;t doing anything different with the NYT except he is using not only his own money but also the stock holders as well (without their permission).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, come on Tom, from the lib&#8217;s point of view, the economy is in recession and has been since W took office.   As I have noted elsewhere before, whether it be Air America (radio), the media or print, all of these lib dominated groups are in ratings decline because their product is not what the public wants to buy.  I would submit the success of the internet news outlets have more to do with the failed business model of ceaseless propaganda from the print and media than anything else.  The consumer seeks out alternate product when the price is too high or the quality is too poor, it&#8217;s called value.  The day the MSM drops the propagandizing and actually reports the news accurately is the day you and I will be writing to a non-existent audience.  In this we have job security because the libs won&#8217;t change their behavior because the financial consequences aren&#8217;t their concern.  The NYT will sell the assertion to support the agenda until the last employee turns off the lights as they are walking out the door for the very last time.  Air America is the example of this propaganda effort.  The only reason it survives is because Mark and Stephen Green are bankrolling the sales effort.  In doing so they get an illegal tax deduction under the guise of a business write off since you can&#8217;t deduct political contributions (free positive air time) for their infomercials supporting the Dem party.  The Greens aren&#8217;t stupid, they made the money in the first place and they are spending it in the most cost effective manner possible to advance the liberal agenda.  Sulzberger isn&#8217;t doing anything different with the NYT except he is using not only his own money but also the stock holders as well (without their permission).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
