May 19, 2008

Media Snoozes While Obama’s ‘Altered States’ Gaffes Continue

Filed under: MSM Biz/Other Bias, MSM Biz/Other Ignorance, Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 1:41 pm

Noel Sheppard of NewsBusters posted Saturday on Barack Obama’s tirade against Fox News.

The underlying report by Ryan Alessi of McClatchy’s Lexington Herald-Leader also contained this nugget (HT National Review’ Online’s Media Blog), showing that the candidate’s basic geography challenges continue:

Obama conceded that he has a steep challenge to get his message and background to voters in states such as Kentucky — where he trails Sen. Hillary Clinton by 27 points, according to a poll published earlier this week — and West Virginia, where voters chose Clinton over Obama by 40 points on Tuesday.

“What it says is that I’m not very well known in that part of the country,” Obama said. “Sen. Clinton, I think, is much better known, coming from a nearby state of Arkansas. So it’s not surprising that she would have an advantage in some of those states in the middle.”

Trouble is, as a look at a US map (with territories) shows, Arkansas may be “nearby,” but Obama’s home state of Illinois is “adjacent”:

USmapOrigFromNRO0508

Greg Polliwitz at NRO’s Media Blog asks:

Can the man who wants to be President please tell us why Arkansas is somehow closer to Kentucky than Illinois??????

This gaffe comes on the heels of Obama’s “state”-ment of May 9 that “I’ve been in 57 states, (with) I think one left to go.”

As I noted last week (at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog), during the 1992 campaign, Vice President Dan Quayle was pilloried from June until Election Day over his misspelling of a word.

I would suggest that Quayle’s error is “small potatoes” compared to the stunning geographic ignorance that is becoming a routine occurrence with Obama.

Clearly, Old Media disagrees. A Google News search on “nearby state of Arkansas” (in quotes) came back with three results. Two of them are Alessi’s report. The other is at the American Thinker blog.

Perhaps, in addition to Jeremiah Wright and Obama’s wife Michelle, the candidate and his campaign will demand that geography be made an off-limits topic.

Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org.

_________________________________________

UPDATE, May 21: Michelle Malkin — “Gaffe Machine.”

Things I’d Like to Post About Today ….. (051908, Morning)

Filed under: TILTpatBIDHAT — TBlumer @ 8:33 am

….. but I don’t have time for:

  • It looks like the candidate I refer to as HR4C (Hillary Rodham Cackling Crying Complaining Clinton) is going to win yet another “irrelevant” (if you believe the lapdog, fawning Old Media) blowout win — this time in Kentucky.
  • Kentucky has a larger population than Oregon (4.2 mil vs. 3.7 mil), where the other major Dem primary is being held this week. If the candidate I refer to as Mr. BOOHOO-OUCH (Barack O-bomba Overseas Hussein “Obambi” Obama - Objectively Unfit Coddler of Haters) wins Oregon (probably by a much narrower margin), who wants to bet against that win will get more attention?
  • Speaking of Obama’s nickname, that “Mr. BOOHOO-OUCH” tag describes the campaign’s “it’s all about me, and you must be talking about me” reaction to Bush’s speech last week at the Knesset, doesn’t it? The reaction just proves, as Captain Ed pointed out on Friday, that Obama owns appeasement.
  • By the way, Bush’s full speech, probably his best since just after the 9/11 attacks, is here, and worth reading.
  • While the three remaining presidential candidates, including the one I refer to as JS3M3 (John Sidney the Mad Maverick McCain III), are all trying to out-green each other, the worldwide ongoing resistance to globaloney (my term for the notions that catastrophic global warming is occurring, that it is caused by man, and that we must fundamentally alter world commerce to prevent it) grows. I see at least three “we’re not going to take it” stories a day coming out of Europe and Asia. Here’s one: Britain wants to slap the equivalent of an $780 tax on older “gas guzzling” cars. The blowback has been so strong (one editorial here) that it could take down the once thought untouchable government of Gordon Brown.
  • Bill Cosby appears unwiling to drink the Obama kool-aid.
  • Jeannine Aversa and her AP colleagues just won’t let go of their recession obsession. Aversa’s latest offering says that “A growing number of economists believe the country is on the brink of a recession or in one already” — unnamed, as usual. Apparently, economists at the National Association of Business Economics (NABE) are catching the AP disease, as “56 percent of (those surveyed) think the economy has started or will enter a recession this year.” At the same time, these economists say that growth “will slow to 1.4% this year.”

    Follow me closely, everyone:
    – Let’s say first quarter growth stays at the 0.6% reported last month (a group willing to be cited by name, as Wall Street Journal reporters Kelly Evans and Justin Lahart noted last week, believes that it will be revised upward to 1.0%).
    – Growth for the whole year, as just noted, is expected to be 1.4%.
    – That means that growth during the year’s remaining three quarters is forecast to be about 1.67%.

    So now we can have a recession when growth is over 1.5%? This is crazy.

    Steve Matthews of Bloomberg (”U.S. Recession to End by September, Business Economists Say”") clearly assumes we’re in a recession now.

    This last item went up in very expanded form at this NewsBusters post.

Positivity: Celtics’ success traced, in part, to the fortunes of a blind son

Filed under: Positivity — TBlumer @ 5:56 am

From Boston, via ESPN.com:

Updated: May 17, 2008, 2:36 PM ET

Campbell Grousbeck sits at his granite kitchen counter, attacking a steaming dish of pasta and broccoli. He sips a pink vitaminwater, power-c (dragonfruit), and, being an acutely social 15-year-old, he asks a guest his favorite flavor.

“Uh,” the guest says, trying to buy time, “the red kind.”

This is not a good answer, for a number of reasons, but Campbell doesn’t flinch.

“What are the ingredients?” he asks.

“Blueberry and, hmmm …”

“Pomegranate,” Campbell says, triumphantly. “That’s triple-X, triple antioxidants.”

Yes, in fact, that’s it — XXX. Now, this is a solid effort for anyone, but well, here’s the thing: Campbell Grousbeck is blind. How does he know that?

“Campbell,” his father says, smiling, “is a pretty smart guy.”

The apple apparently doesn’t fall far from the tree. Campbell’s father, Wycliffe “Wyc” Grousbeck, is the chief executive officer of the Boston Celtics. In 2002, he led a group of local investors who purchased the NBA franchise.

It now has been 22 seasons since the league’s most decorated franchise won a title. That the Celtics still are a threat to hoist a 17th championship banner this season is largely a result of the aggressive, spare-no-expense leadership of Wyc and his partners. And that Wyc found himself in position to buy the team, oddly enough, can be traced directly back to Campbell’s blindness. So, as you watch Kevin Garnett elevate under the basket and swat away the shots, and see Paul Pierce and Ray Allen singe the twine, know this:

It’s all happening because of a sweet, slight boy who can’t see any of it.

“We would be out in California, probably, and my golf game would be a little bit better, but I wouldn’t be getting ready for a playoff game tonight,” Wyc said several weeks ago. “If not for Campbell, we wouldn’t be here.”

Said Wyc’s wife, Corinne: “We would never be out here if it were not for Campbell. I mean, that’s a real example of following the child. We followed him clear across the country.”

Adjusting expectations

Wyc Grousbeck grew up in Weston, Mass., a wooded suburb west of Boston. His father, Irving, took his four children to Fenway Park and Boston Garden several times a year, and those experiences created a profound bond with the professional sporting teams.

Irving co-founded Continental Cablevision Inc. in 1963, and he and his partner, Amos Hostetter, ultimately sold it for $11.5 billion. Wyc attended Noble and Greenough, a prep school in nearby Dedham, and, later, Princeton University, where he earned a degree in history. After earning a law degree at the University of Michigan and an MBA from the Stanford Business School, he spent four years as a venture capital lawyer in Silicon Valley. He had married Corinne, whom he met at Michigan, and they were living in the Bay Area with 3-year-old Kelsey when Campbell was born in 1992.

“Everything was going to just sort of fall into place,” Corinne said, “and we were going to live in California and have this happily-ever-after kind of life.”

But soon, they noticed Campbell wasn’t like other babies. He didn’t respond to visual stimuli. They took him to eye specialists and eventually learned he had Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), an inherited retinal degenerative disease characterized by a severe loss of vision at birth.

“It hits you pretty hard,” Corinne said. “Most of it was [feeling] sorry for him, a lot of sort of grieving over expectations that are not going to be met.”

After the Grousbecks worked themselves out of their “disbelief haze,” they aggressively confronted the problem. Wyc investigated the science and technology that might restore Campbell’s vision. Corrine went to the local library and sifted through piles of materials. Everything she found pointed to the Perkins School for the Blind in Watertown, Mass.

The school, founded 179 years ago, became famous for successfully educating Helen Keller in the late 19th century. Today’s 38-acre campus sits along the Charles River and exudes the charm and cheer of an Ivy League institution.

When Wyc and Corinne visited, they were impressed by the independence of the students, making their way to class confidently with canes, and the low student-to-teacher ratio. They knew almost immediately that it was the place for their 2-year-old son. Before their first morning there ended, they knew they had to call a realtor. …..

Go here for the rest of the story.