May 24, 2008

California Draggin’: Its Basket-Case Economy and Bloated Welfare System Are Holding Back the US Economy

Filed under: Economy,Taxes & Government — Tom @ 8:33 am

Note: This was originally posted at Pajamas Media on Thursday under the title “California Draggin’: Golden State’s Economy Hurts America.”

______________________________________________

There is talk that John McCain actually has a chance to take California in November’s presidential election.

Don’t count on it.

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger may have endorsed McCain for president, but his economic stewardship will likely be fatal to the Arizona Senator’s chances of winning the Golden State.

California’s economy is performing so poorly that it is singlehandedly making the rest of the nation’s economy look worse than it really is.

Take just one measure, unemployment (Source – Bureau of Labor Statistics; the seasonally adjusted “sum of the states” unemployment rate of 4.92% varies from the nationwide rate of 5.0% because of differing data collection methods):

CaliAndUSunemployment0408

The Not-So-Golden State has almost 12% of the country’s workforce, but 15% of its unemployed. Without California, the nation’s unemployment rate would be almost 0.2% lower, and the press wouldn’t be obsessing about the supposed recession (or at least not as much).

Worse still, less than five years after California’s historic recall of sitting Governor Gray Davis and Schwarzenegger’s landslide election to replace him, the Golden State is once again in a serious self-inflicted budget crunch:

Unlike previous summer standoffs during (Governor Arnold) Schwarzenegger’s reign, the state this time could run out of cash. The latest projection is that the till could run dry in early September.

The Governor wants to close a $15 billion budget gap by, of all things, convincing Californians to gamble more — a lot more:

Schwarzenegger last week called for the state, in essence, to borrow against future revenues generated by a massive expansion of the lottery. The state would receive $15 billion over three years from Wall Street investors and pay it back from lottery proceeds over 30 years. Lottery sales would have to double for the plan to work.

How did it come to this?

There are many reasons, but the state’s 12-year refusal to get with the program on Welfare Reform is certainly among the biggest.

The nation’s landmark Welfare Reform law went into effect in 1997. By any reasonable measure, it has been a resounding success. Nationwide, as of December 2007, the number of welfare recipients was 68% lower than 11 years earlier.

During the first six years of reform, welfare rolls came down in California at about the same rate as the rest of the nation. By the end of 2002, the number of families in the state on TANF, or Temporary Assistance for Needy Family Families (the new name for the deservedly stigmatized AFDC, Aid for Families with Dependent Children) was down 47%, compared to 52% for the rest of the country, and total caseload was down 55%, compared to 57% for the rest of the US.

But California’s welfare rolls have for decades been twice as high, as a percentage of the population, as the rest of the country. The declines should have been even more dramatic, and weren’t.

Now the situation is getting worse. Despite having so much room for improvement, and a golden opportunity handed to him to do something about it, welfare rolls in California on Schwarzenegger’s watch have gone up, while the rest of the country has continued to enjoy significant declines.

Here are the raw year-end numbers of recipients and families on welfare in California and the rest of the country since 2002:

CAwelfareTANFrawnumbers1207Fnl

These graphs illustrate just how bad things are:

CAwelfareGraphsThru1207Fnl

(Sources: ACF’s Office of Family Assistance for families and caseload; Census Bureau for population.)

Taking them one at a time:

  1. The percentage of residents on welfare in the Golden State is now more that triple that of the rest of the US. If it reflected the rest of the country, California would have 800,000 fewer people receiving welfare.
  2. While caseloads in the rest of the US have dropped over 30% in the past five years, California’s has gone up about 6%.
  3. As a result, though it has only about 12% of the total US population, California’s share of the welfare caseload has risen from 22% in 2002 to over 30%.
  4. There are more welfare recipients per family in California, and that number has crept upward in the past couple of years, perhaps indicating that California welfare mothers are bearing more children that those in the rest of the US.

Governor Schwarzenegger and his state were very fortunate during his first few years in office. The economic growth created by the Bush tax cuts came at just the right time. The state also received some lucky onetime windfalls, including the hundreds of millions of dollars founders and insiders at Google coughed up when they cashed in their stock options.

Unfortunately, it appears that the good fortune enabled the state to avoid serious expenditure reform in welfare, and surely other areas, that Schwarzenegger should have aggressively undertaken when he took office.

Now the party’s over. Because of that, the chances that John McCain will be partying over a November win in California are nowhere near as good as they should be.

Share

1 Comment

  1. What’s even worse is that California is forcing the rest of the US to subsidize it’s poor policy decisions. In essence, the mere fact that CA has a disproportionate share of people on Welfare and unemployment means they are by default getting a disproportionate share of federal dollars as a result. Compounding this policy failure is the sanctuary city movement causing 11.9% unemployment in some areas of CA. Since only US citizens should be drawing government benefits, that means every illegal working a job in CA is displacing a citizen who should be working and thus causing them to draw government benefits. Which means, we the taxpayer are subsidizing their failed policies.

    While we can not conclusively make the case that illegal employment is proportional to unemployment over the country as a whole, given the huge illegal population in CA we can rightfully say that the illegal immigration condoned by the sanctuary city movement was the straw that broke the camel’s back in CA’s case. CA is the example of what would happen to the rest of the country if we didn’t close the borders and enforced labor laws.

    Tom, it would be instructive to your readers to know the cost of CA’s policy decisions. That is the difference between the US average unemployment and TANF case load versus CA. This is the cost of liberal Democrats policy failures.

    Comment by dscott — May 26, 2008 @ 11:34 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.