Comments on: Obama’s Blueprint for Surrendering in the War on Terror, Unilateral Disarmament, and Endangering National Security http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/30/obamas-blueprint-for-surrendering-in-the-war-on-terror-unilateral-disarmament-and-jeopardizing-national-security/ The Business End of the Blogosphere Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:47:28 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: TBlumer http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/30/obamas-blueprint-for-surrendering-in-the-war-on-terror-unilateral-disarmament-and-jeopardizing-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-122657 TBlumer Sat, 31 May 2008 22:39:57 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/30/obamas-blueprint-for-surrendering-in-the-war-on-terror-unilateral-disarmament-and-jeopardizing-national-security/#comment-122657 <i>Clinton merely hit targets established by Cheney under Bush41, but you know that.</i> NO I don't, but even if it were so (and it isn't), the world changed and got more dangerous than anticipated, and Clinton did less than nothing (with the unfortunate help of Congress). Clinton merely hit targets established by Cheney under Bush41, but you know that.

NO I don’t, but even if it were so (and it isn’t), the world changed and got more dangerous than anticipated, and Clinton did less than nothing (with the unfortunate help of Congress).

]]> By: Tony B. http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/30/obamas-blueprint-for-surrendering-in-the-war-on-terror-unilateral-disarmament-and-jeopardizing-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-122655 Tony B. Sat, 31 May 2008 17:49:13 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/30/obamas-blueprint-for-surrendering-in-the-war-on-terror-unilateral-disarmament-and-jeopardizing-national-security/#comment-122655 Clinton merely hit targets established by Cheney under Bush41, but you know that. Your IBD link tells us “Iraqi forces ran al-Qaida terrorists out of Mosul, the terror organization's final urban stronghold.” While it is nice to see Iraqi forces doing something on their own for a change, lets not forget that al-Qaida didn’t exist in Iraq until George W. Bush foolishly invaded. al-Qaida in Iraq is not the organization that attacked us on 9/11. Bush attacked the wrong target, and he can't get us out. Clinton merely hit targets established by Cheney under Bush41, but you know that.

Your IBD link tells us “Iraqi forces ran al-Qaida terrorists out of Mosul, the terror organization’s final urban stronghold.” While it is nice to see Iraqi forces doing something on their own for a change, lets not forget that al-Qaida didn’t exist in Iraq until George W. Bush foolishly invaded. al-Qaida in Iraq is not the organization that attacked us on 9/11. Bush attacked the wrong target, and he can’t get us out.

]]> By: TBlumer http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/30/obamas-blueprint-for-surrendering-in-the-war-on-terror-unilateral-disarmament-and-jeopardizing-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-122652 TBlumer Sat, 31 May 2008 05:20:44 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/30/obamas-blueprint-for-surrendering-in-the-war-on-terror-unilateral-disarmament-and-jeopardizing-national-security/#comment-122652 #1, I did re-listen. Twice. Unilateral. Disarmament. China free to do as it pleases. Deliberately slowing down tech development. It's amazing what ignorance you reveal. Cheney reduced forces in reax to the end of the Cold War while underestimating the Islamic threat. He right-sized it based on the understanding of the day. After Cheney did his thing, Clinton gutted the military way below what Cheney ever envisioned, even though it was becoming obvious that the Islamist threat was real and growing (as early as 1993 WTC bombing). This IBD link shows how deep the cutting went: <a href="http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1502&status=article&id=290296894663930" rel="nofollow">HERE</A> W himself hasn't ramped up enough. Obama will be worse than Carter. I guess you'll have to read this IBD link to see how badly this "mistaken" war and related items are going: <a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=296780190323947" rel="nofollow">HERE</a> #1, I did re-listen. Twice.

Unilateral. Disarmament. China free to do as it pleases. Deliberately slowing down tech development.

It’s amazing what ignorance you reveal. Cheney reduced forces in reax to the end of the Cold War while underestimating the Islamic threat. He right-sized it based on the understanding of the day.

After Cheney did his thing, Clinton gutted the military way below what Cheney ever envisioned, even though it was becoming obvious that the Islamist threat was real and growing (as early as 1993 WTC bombing).

This IBD link shows how deep the cutting went:
HERE

W himself hasn’t ramped up enough. Obama will be worse than Carter.

I guess you’ll have to read this IBD link to see how badly this “mistaken” war and related items are going:
HERE

]]> By: Tony B. http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/30/obamas-blueprint-for-surrendering-in-the-war-on-terror-unilateral-disarmament-and-jeopardizing-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-122651 Tony B. Sat, 31 May 2008 04:27:10 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/05/30/obamas-blueprint-for-surrendering-in-the-war-on-terror-unilateral-disarmament-and-jeopardizing-national-security/#comment-122651 It was radical Defense Secretary Dick Cheney who proposed cutting our military personnel by more than 25%. Clinton just finished implementing Cheney’s plan: “Early in 1991 the secretary unveiled a plan to reduce military strength by the mid-1990s to 1.6 million, compared to 2.2 million when he entered office. In his budget proposal for FY 1993, his last one, Cheney asked for termination of the B-2 program at 20 aircraft, cancellation of the Midgetman, and limitations on advanced cruise missile purchases to those already authorized.” http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/secdef_histories/bios/cheney.htm George W. Bush sadly yet literally “gutted” the military by losing 4,000 soldiers and three-quarters of a trillion dollars in his deceitfully and mistakenly waged war in Iraq. Obama is not talking about “surrendering in the war on terror" or “unilateral disarmament.” He’s just talking sense. Listen again. It was radical Defense Secretary Dick Cheney who proposed cutting our military personnel by more than 25%. Clinton just finished implementing Cheney’s plan:

“Early in 1991 the secretary unveiled a plan to reduce military strength by the mid-1990s to 1.6 million, compared to 2.2 million when he entered office. In his budget proposal for FY 1993, his last one, Cheney asked for termination of the B-2 program at 20 aircraft, cancellation of the Midgetman, and limitations on advanced cruise missile purchases to those already authorized.”

http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/secdef_histories/bios/cheney.htm

George W. Bush sadly yet literally “gutted” the military by losing 4,000 soldiers and three-quarters of a trillion dollars in his deceitfully and mistakenly waged war in Iraq.

Obama is not talking about “surrendering in the war on terror” or “unilateral disarmament.” He’s just talking sense. Listen again.

]]>