Column of the Day: Sowell on Obama’s ‘Irrelevant Apologies’
It is amazing how seriously the media are taking Senator Barack Obama’s latest statement about the latest racist rant from the pulpit of the church he has attended for 20 years. But neither that statement nor the apology for his rant by Father Michael Pfleger really matters, one way or the other. Nor does Senator Obama’s belated resignation from that church.
For any politician, what matters is not his election year rhetoric, or an election year resignation from a church, but the track record of that politician in the years before the election.
Despite clever spin from Obama’s supporters about avoiding “guilt by association,” much more is involved than casual association with people like Jeremiah Wright and Father Pfleger.
In addition to giving $20,000 of his own money to Jeremiah Wright, as a state senator Obama directed $225,000 of the Illinois taxpayers’ money for programs run by Father Pfleger. In the U.S. Senate, Obama earmarked $100,000 in federal tax money for Father Pfleger’s work. Giving someone more than 300 grand is not just some tenuous, coincidental association.
Are Barack Obama’s views shown by what he says during an election year or by what he has been doing for decades before?
The complete contrast between Obama’s election year image as a healer of divisions and his whole career of promoting far-left grievance politics, in association with America-haters like Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers, are brushed aside by his supporters who talk about getting back to “the real issues.”
There is nothing more real than a man’s character and values. The track record of what he has actually done is far more real than anything he says, however elegantly he says it.
The objectively unfit Obama should get swept away if the election is even remotely about character. And of course it is, regardless of the outcome.










End All Earmarks! I get so pissed when people rationalize earmarks as doing some good or minimize them by saying they are a tiny percentage of the budget (even heard Limbaugh dismiss earmarks as too small to care about). Doesn’t matter the size. Sure $200k may seem small to a congresscritter used to wasting billions, but I guarantee you it seemed like a lot of money to Pfleger. Beyond the Obama examples, the bigger problem with earmarks is it makes it easier for a congresscritter to pay back a past campaign donation/bribe.
Comment by largebill — June 3, 2008 @ 12:11 pm