You’re free to go away any time, but if you leave over this, you’ll have no credibility unless you promise not to see an R-Rated movie for the rest of your life.

Interesting how 2-4 others didn’t take any offense. Probably because the word is accurate and appropriate in context.

Clean up your act.

The entry itself refers to someone else who used the same visceral, not vulgar, headline.

Did you read this entry before commenting?

Also look here, here, here, here, and here. Oh, and here (over 60 results).

You were saying….?

If “arrogant pricks” is what you refer to, I see that the dictionary considers “prick” to be “usually vulgar.” I am so (not) chastened. The sense of the entry is plural of “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority.” Hardly vulgar.

I don’t take well to bullying by an arrogant near-monopoly that wants to rewrite two centuries of constitutional law just because they have deep pockets.

I also don’t take well to being blamed for this by people who didn’t do their jobs and investigate someone who should have been — and then, when the person is caught, allows him to blame others and use his wife as a rhetorical human shield, when what HE said and did is what was at issue.

I think the contempt is fully justified.

I think AP is testing the waters in various ways to see how far they can push the limits. If Obama is elected, they’ll push harder; count on it.

I would say the arrogant left at the AP are no different than the arrogant left they are attacking.

It is fun to watch the left eat it’s own.