<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LAT&#8217;s Rutten on Edwards Affair: &#8216;Old Media Dethroned&#8217;; I Say &#8216;Maybe&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/08/10/lats-rutten-on-edwards-affair-old-media-dethroned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/08/10/lats-rutten-on-edwards-affair-old-media-dethroned/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:47:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/08/10/lats-rutten-on-edwards-affair-old-media-dethroned/comment-page-1/#comment-123799</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=7317#comment-123799</guid>
		<description>#2, you&#039;ll LOL at the NYT&#039;s excuse-making, given what you mentioned:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/08/10/nyt-edwards-scandal-not-our-style-unproven-mccain-affair&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; at NewsBusters

NYT&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/10/opinion/10pubed.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Public Editor&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2, you&#8217;ll LOL at the NYT&#8217;s excuse-making, given what you mentioned:</p>
<p><a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/08/10/nyt-edwards-scandal-not-our-style-unproven-mccain-affair" rel="nofollow">HERE</a> at NewsBusters</p>
<p>NYT&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/10/opinion/10pubed.html?_r=2&#038;oref=slogin&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss&#038;pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">Public Editor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Vice</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/08/10/lats-rutten-on-edwards-affair-old-media-dethroned/comment-page-1/#comment-123794</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Vice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=7317#comment-123794</guid>
		<description>When we posted this story in Dec. 2007 (and we certainly werenâ€™t the only blog to do so)  the article was hit about 6,000 times, leading me to believe that it was absolutely newsworthy with or without Edwardâ€™s admission.  After all - all the same elements are there.  Not much has changed in a half a year.

The fly in the ointment here though is that is shows pretty plainly how bent the media is.  Oh yeah, I know, theyâ€™ll cover liberal goofs when they absolutely have to.  The cable news networks are forcing them to cover all sorts of things they didnâ€™t want to cover before....

However the newspapers - like the NY Times will splash an unproven, story about McCain alleged affair all over the front page, while the Edwards story (which has had sources, photos, witnesses and the womanâ€™s allegations) was flatly ignored.

Now the liberal press proports â€œheâ€™s not running for anything, why does it matter?â€

Well, the story happened when he was running for something - he then was a viable VP candidate and lastly, yes, he STILL in active in the political process, stumping for Obama.

To say itâ€™s not a legitimate, serious story is pure nonsense - and since I seriously doubt Edwards is coming clean about the child being his, it will continue to be a story.

Danny Vice
http://www.theweeklyvice.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we posted this story in Dec. 2007 (and we certainly werenâ€™t the only blog to do so)  the article was hit about 6,000 times, leading me to believe that it was absolutely newsworthy with or without Edwardâ€™s admission.  After all &#8211; all the same elements are there.  Not much has changed in a half a year.</p>
<p>The fly in the ointment here though is that is shows pretty plainly how bent the media is.  Oh yeah, I know, theyâ€™ll cover liberal goofs when they absolutely have to.  The cable news networks are forcing them to cover all sorts of things they didnâ€™t want to cover before&#8230;.</p>
<p>However the newspapers &#8211; like the NY Times will splash an unproven, story about McCain alleged affair all over the front page, while the Edwards story (which has had sources, photos, witnesses and the womanâ€™s allegations) was flatly ignored.</p>
<p>Now the liberal press proports â€œheâ€™s not running for anything, why does it matter?â€</p>
<p>Well, the story happened when he was running for something &#8211; he then was a viable VP candidate and lastly, yes, he STILL in active in the political process, stumping for Obama.</p>
<p>To say itâ€™s not a legitimate, serious story is pure nonsense &#8211; and since I seriously doubt Edwards is coming clean about the child being his, it will continue to be a story.</p>
<p>Danny Vice<br />
<a href="http://www.theweeklyvice.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.theweeklyvice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Keeler</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/08/10/lats-rutten-on-edwards-affair-old-media-dethroned/comment-page-1/#comment-123791</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Keeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=7317#comment-123791</guid>
		<description>I dont think any there is any question that he will be attempting a political comeback of some kind.  Just a matter of when.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think any there is any question that he will be attempting a political comeback of some kind.  Just a matter of when.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
