Well, I was wrong last week when I asserted that retired New York Times reporter David Cay Johnston wouldn’t be engaging in his apparently annual silliness with IRS data for the Times this year (six errors found in his rendering from last year were cataloged here).
I am sorry about that. Times readers, and the Times’s editors, should be more sorry.
In what I suppose is an honorary reappearance, Johnston is back again with another snorter.
If you doubt my harsh assessment, first establish in your own mind what the following headline and sentence mean:
Average U.S. Income Rose in 2006
Americans enjoyed higher average income in 2006 for the first time since 2000, when the last economic expansion ended, the latest tax data show.
Then go to his Times article and see what Johnston, the headline writer, and the Times’s alleged editors think they mean. You won’t believe it (well, considering it’s from Johnston and what remains of the Times, maybe you will).
I hope against hope that the Times didn’t pay Johnston anything extra for this. That’s the only way the Old Gray Lady could have gotten her money’s worth.
I may have more on this later — if I can stand it.
Update, 715 a.m.: OMG — They’ve already changed the headline from when I first saw it (about 11 PM last night). Now it’s “Average U.S. Income Showed First Rise Over 2000.” Even that’s a bit “inartful” (and wrong, because IRS Adjusted Gross Income is not “income” or “gross income” as the average person understands it). The first sentence remains the same. I took a picture of the whole thing. We’ll have to see if it does any more morphing.
________________________________________________
This is an important and in my opinion favorable development:
Illegal Immigrants Returning to Mexico in Record Numbers
….. The illegal immigrant population in the U.S. has dropped 11 percent since August of last year, according to the Center for Immigration Studies. Its research shows 1.3 million illegal immigrants have returned to their home countries.
It also has all kinds of potential impact on the economic data that’s being published, and on its interpretation. Think about it: job reports, GDP, income — the list goes on and on. There’s lots of sorting out to do.
But please, let the out-migration of illegals continue.
________________________________________________
Scott Beauchamp, who embarrassed himself and The New Republic with his writings from Iraq last year, attempts to rehabilitate himself in a Radar Online interview.
That may end up not be nearly as interesting as the first comment made there, or the link included in that comment.
________________________________________________
Attention Team McCain: One of your Veep shortlisters has connections to the guy discussed here. Hint: He’s already Objectively Unfit, and, thanks to the investments made by him, his family, and his “former” firm, at a minimum not clearly on our side in appearance.
_________________________________________________
Here’s important reading that will provide a meaningful contrast to the Denver event where “The One” I refer to as “Mr. BOOHOO-OUCH” (Barack O-bomba Overseas Hussein “Obambi” Obama - Objectively Unfit Coddler of Haters) will accept his party’s nomination — “The Obama-Ayers Top Ten: Highlights of the 20 year Obama-Ayers Connection.”
Here’s more, from Mark at Weapons of Mass Discussion — “One of Obama’s Mentors is Just SICK!!!! Frank Marshall Davis, Communist… and Pedophile?”
The underlying UK Telegraph article is here.
Wow. That’s mentoring you can believe in.
______________________________________________
Dan Scott has five Veep recommendations for the presidential candidate I refer to as “JS3M3″ (John Sidney the Mad Maverick McCain III): Tom Tancredo, Alan Keyes, Michael Steele, Duncan Hunter, Fred Thompson.
My take:
- Tancredo? Way too much diametric opposition between the two. Never happen. Someone needs to prove that immigration can swing congressional and Senate elections before using the presidential race as the guinea pig.
- Keyes? You don’t put the guy who only got 20% or so against Obama in the 2004 Illinois US Senate race on your ticket. No way.
- Steele? I hope not. He’s not prolife.
- Hunter? An absolutely awesome idea.
- Fred? The base would be so energized the delegates could float home from Minneapolis.