
___________________________________________________
TOPSIDE UPDATE: Maggie Thurber and Alo at Brain Shavings, who have done much more with this story than yours truly, have posts up. Alo also tipped Michelle Malkin, who writes, “This should be done in every one of the states where ACORN ‘franchises’ operate.” Word.
___________________________________________________
Plaintiffs Jennifer Miller and Kimberly Grant, residents and registered voters in Warren County, Ohio, with the help of the Buckeye Institute’s 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, filed suit today against ACORN and Project Vote in Warren County Common Pleas Court.
A PDF copy of the complaint is here.
Obama’s name comes up at least three times in the complaint (bolds are mine):
(Page 3) 18. Defendant is engaged in massive voter registration drives and political canvassing throughout the state of Ohio and the United States of America; some of this work is performed on behalf of current United States of America presidential candidate Barack Obama.
(Page 3) 19. ACORN’s political wing has endorsed Barack Obama for president, and during the primary season, the Obama camp paid Citizen Service Inc., $832,598 for various political services according to Federal Elections Commission filings. Citizen Services, Inc. and ACORN share the same board of directors.
(Page 9) 69. In Texas, where ACORN’s affiliate, Citizens Services Inc., has provided contract work on behalf of Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, the Houston Chronicle reported on August 17, 2008 that “About 40 percent of the 27,000 registration cards gathered by ACORN from January through July have been rejected or placed in limbo pending the gathering of more information, according to the county” while “about 6,600 were filled out by people already registered, and many others contained insufficient information.”
Will Old Media report the claims raised by plaintiffs?
As they say, developing …..
_________________________________________________
UPDATE: Plaintiffs are seeking the following (references are to the Ohio Revised Code):
(1) The dissolution of Defendant ACORN, pursuant to R.C. 2923.34(C)(3).
(2) The revocation of any license or permit that allows Defendant ACORN to carry on its business in the State of Ohio, pursuant to R.C. 2923.34(C)(4).
(3) The imposition of restrictions upon Defendant ACORN’s future political and elections-related activities, including restrictions that prohibit the Defendants from engaging in the same type of activity that has produced the pattern of corrupt activity articulated in this Complaint, pursuant to R.C. 2923.34(C)(2).
(4) The imposition of a restriction prohibiting ACORN from circumventing such a court order through the use of third-party operations or sham organizations.
(5) The awarding of attorneys fees to Plaintiffs, pursuant to R.C. 2923.34(G).
(6) The awarding such other and further relief as the court shall deem just and equitable.
UPDATE 2: I’d ordinarily be inclined to see the humor in the Mickey Mouse voter registration noted here. But this is about whether a congenitally corrupt organization will be allowed to desecrate the secular temple known as the voting booth. So, excuse me, I’m not laughing.
UPDATE 3: This is wayyyyyyyy too late to matter, and totally ineffectual, for the reasons noted —
The Obama campaign is now distancing itself from Acorn, claiming Mr. Obama never organized with it and has nothing to do with illegal voter registration. Yet it’s disingenuous to channel cash into an operation with a history of fraud and then claim you’re shocked to discover reports of fraud. As with Rev. Jeremiah Wright and William Ayers, Mr. Obama was happy to associate with Acorn when it suited his purposes. But now that he’s on the brink of the Presidency, he wants to disavow his ties.
The Justice Department needs to treat these fraud reports as something larger than a few local violators. The question is whether Acorn is systematically subverting U.S. election law — on the taxpayer’s dime.