<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SC Diocese Appears to Repudiates Catechism; SC Priest Is &#8216;Reined In,&#8217; But Right (Update: Full Text of Letter)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/11/16/sc-diocese-official-appears-to-repudiate-catechism-sc-priest-is-reined-in-but-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/11/16/sc-diocese-official-appears-to-repudiate-catechism-sc-priest-is-reined-in-but-right/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:09:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SC Priest&#8217;s Abortion Supporter&#8217;s Statements Repudiated, Yet Catechism Stands &#171; Quipster</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/11/16/sc-diocese-official-appears-to-repudiate-catechism-sc-priest-is-reined-in-but-right/comment-page-1/#comment-125946</link>
		<dc:creator>SC Priest&#8217;s Abortion Supporter&#8217;s Statements Repudiated, Yet Catechism Stands &#171; Quipster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=7710#comment-125946</guid>
		<description>[...] being said, let us explore what the Catechism has said.  Bizzy Blog has done an outstanding job in collecting this together. Father Newman made no “statements [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] being said, let us explore what the Catechism has said.  Bizzy Blog has done an outstanding job in collecting this together. Father Newman made no “statements [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetownecrier</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/11/16/sc-diocese-official-appears-to-repudiate-catechism-sc-priest-is-reined-in-but-right/comment-page-1/#comment-125945</link>
		<dc:creator>thetownecrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=7710#comment-125945</guid>
		<description>Outstanding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack L</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/11/16/sc-diocese-official-appears-to-repudiate-catechism-sc-priest-is-reined-in-but-right/comment-page-1/#comment-125943</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=7710#comment-125943</guid>
		<description>Well done. What&#039;s clear is that some Bishops and diocesan officials will have to find their backbone regarding this issue. In the meantime, it sadly falls upon the shoulders of informed laity to help them find the courage to teach Catholic doctrine to Catholics. Weird state of affairs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done. What&#8217;s clear is that some Bishops and diocesan officials will have to find their backbone regarding this issue. In the meantime, it sadly falls upon the shoulders of informed laity to help them find the courage to teach Catholic doctrine to Catholics. Weird state of affairs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BakerStreetRider</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/11/16/sc-diocese-official-appears-to-repudiate-catechism-sc-priest-is-reined-in-but-right/comment-page-1/#comment-125936</link>
		<dc:creator>BakerStreetRider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=7710#comment-125936</guid>
		<description>I think there is more to this than meets the eye.  There is evidence to show that Fr. Laughlin was coerced in some way.  

http://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/otr.cfm?id=4872</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is more to this than meets the eye.  There is evidence to show that Fr. Laughlin was coerced in some way.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/otr.cfm?id=4872" rel="nofollow">http://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/otr.cfm?id=4872</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/11/16/sc-diocese-official-appears-to-repudiate-catechism-sc-priest-is-reined-in-but-right/comment-page-1/#comment-125933</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=7710#comment-125933</guid>
		<description>Tom, I couldn&#039;t agree more.  Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
