April 30, 2009

Press Release From Chrysler’s Non-TARP Lenders: The Day the Rule of Contract Law Died?

Since it’s a press release, there’s no harm in posting this in full, especially since Barack Obama is using the appropriately named bully pulpit to demonize those who released it for merely representing the interests of those whose money they have invested.

And it needs to be (bolds are mine):

Statement From Non-Tarp Lenders To Chrysler

Last update: 10:47 a.m. EDT April 30, 2009

NEW YORK, Apr 30, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) — As of last night’s deadline, we were part of a group of approximately 20 relatively small organizations; we represent many of the country’s teachers unions, major pension and retirement plans and school endowments who have invested through us in senior secured loans to Chrysler. Combined, these loans total about $1 billion. None of us have taken a dime in TARP money.

As much as anyone, we want to see Chrysler emerge from its current situation as a viable American company, and we are committed to doing what we can to help. Indeed, we have made significant concessions toward this end – although we have been systematically precluded from engaging in direct discussions or negotiations with the government; instead, we have been forced to communicate through an obviously conflicted intermediary: a group of banks that have received billions of TARP funds.

What created this much-publicized impasse? Under long recognized legal and business principles, junior creditors are ordinarily not entitled to anything until senior secured creditors like our investors are repaid in full. Nevertheless, to facilitate Chrysler’s rehabilitation, we offered to take a 40% haircut even though some groups lower down in the legal priority chain in Chrysler debt were being given recoveries of up to 50% or more and being allowed to take out billions of dollars. In contrast, over at General Motors, senior secured lenders are being left unimpaired with 100% recoveries, while even GM’s unsecured bondholders are receiving a far better recovery than we are as Chrysler’s first lien secured lenders.

Our offer has been flatly rejected or ignored. The fact is, in this process and in its earnest effort to ensure the survival of Chrysler and the well being of the company’s employees, the government has risked overturning the rule of law and practices that have governed our world-leading bankruptcy code for decades.

We have a fiduciary responsibility to all those teachers, pensioners, retirees and others who have entrusted their money to us. We are legally bound to protect their interests. Much as we empathize with Chrysler’s other stakeholders, the capital is just not ours to contribute to their cause by accepting a deal that is outside the well established legal framework and cannot be rationalized as being commercially reasonable.

We are continuing to discuss our position with the United States Treasury. We have made a proposal which we earnestly believe is fair and would appropriately recognize our legal position.

As President Obama implied yesterday, it is likely that Chrysler will have to file Chapter 11 whether or not all lenders agree to any particular proposal. Chapter 11 is often used to help implement an agreed deal and dispose of unwanted legacy liabilities. We are hopeful and optimistic that we will reach a positive resolution of our issues so that all stakeholders will move forward together to implement Chrysler’s “quick trip” restructuring in an un-contested proceeding. Our Group will never initiate a bankruptcy filing on Chrysler – that is a decision for the Company and the Administration to make.

As we all appreciate, laws are the foundation of our economy and society. Despite recent travails, our country remains the economic envy of the world and the United States remains a vital engine of global growth. The rule of law made it that way. We urge that people remember this and not succumb to unproductive and unwarranted finger pointing.

The Committee of Chrysler Non-Tarp Lenders
SOURCE: The Committee of Chrysler Non-Tarp Lenders

Legally, if such things matter anymore, the bankruptcy filing takes the secured non-TARP lenders back up to presumptive 100% recovery of whatever is available, with senior priority. If I were with the non-TARP lenders, I’d say “bring it on” in a normal bankruptcy proceeding. In fact, they would appear to have a fiduciary duty, if such things matter any more, to do just that.

The government can’t force them down (yet), the UAW can’t force them down, and the TARP-handicapped banks can’t force them down. Only a bankruptcy judge can. Will he or she follow his or her oath to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law, or give in to a budding authoritarian enterprise?

April 30, 2009, may indeed go down as the day the Rule of Contract Law died.


UPDATE: A Jessica Pressler at nymag.com calls the above statement in which the lenders assert their rights and invoke the rule of law “push(ing) the Obama-is-a-Communist button.” Bleep you, Jessica. Bleeeeeeep you.

UPDATE 2: Obama’s demonization includes a heavy dose of cowardice –

With a flash of anger Thursday morning, President Barack Obama offered a blistering critique of “a small group of speculators” who refused to go along with the government’s plan to keep Chrysler out of bankruptcy.

But in a background briefing with reporters at the White House later, senior administration officials would not say exactly who the speculators are that have angered the president.

“We know who some of them are,” said an administration official. But asked if he would name them, the official said, “no.”

The White House is somewhat hamstrung because it is not dealing with the lenders directly. Instead, Obama’s auto task force is negotiating with J.P. Morgan, which is serving as the lenders’ agent. J.P. Morgan represented lenders that agreed to take the deal as well as those that rejected it.

Even as lawmakers on Capitol Hill were blaming at least three funds – Oppenheimer Funds, Perella Weinberg Partners and Stairway Capital – White House officials are declining to name names. Still, the administration official insisted, “we’re not trying to hide them or protect them.”

No, they want to ward off a backlash from those noted in the first paragraph of the release whose investments the funds have been trying to salvage.

Obama was invoking the ghost of FDR, who frequently demonized stock and other speculators during the Great Depression he singlehandedly lengthened to over a decade, and directing his wrath at lenders. These aren’t “speculators”; they are entities that rent out capital in return for (hopefully) being repaid.

This actually explains the mortgage-lending mess. Our President apparently believes that anyone who lends money, expects it back, and negotiates aggressively to protect their interests when they’re not getting paid is a “speculator” — and “speculators” can apparently be screwed without remorse or regret.

Someone will probably try to play the “coward” card with the following, so let’s head it off at the pass:

The group – which refuses to list its members – claims to represent about $1 billion in loans to Chrysler, and says its members have not taken any government TARP bailout money.

What, they’re supposed to volunteer to have Obama’s hired goons known as ACORN and others harass their execs, their families, and their neighbors? I don’t think so.

UPDATE 3: Well, I now see that Matthew Goldstein at Biz Weak played the “coward” card earlier today. See above, Matt.

Obama’s First Hundred Days (Update: ‘SWAGGA’ as the New ‘PUNK’)

ObamaMags0409.jpgI had been hoping to do more with this, but time and technology ran short.

Posting the lyrics to “The Hundred Days of Obama” nonetheless seem appropriate on the day an American icon of sorts bit the dust. So here goes, with some links and graphics to follow later:

The Hundred Days of Obama

In his first hundred days Obama gave to me,
A going-socialist economy.

In his first hundred days Obama gave to me,
Two broke automakers
And a going-socialist economy.

In his first hundred days Obama gave to me,
Three emboldened thugs
Two broke automakers
And a going-socialist economy.

In his first hundred days Obama gave to me,
Four prime-time primpings
Three emboldened thugs
Two broke automakers
And a going-socialist economy.

In his first hundred days Obama gave to me,
Five tax “things.” [1]
Four prime-time primpings,
Three emboldened thugs,
Two broke automakers,
And a going-socialist economy.

In his first hundred days Obama gave to me,
Twelve teleprompters,
Eleven costly bills,
Ten Trillion in Deficits,
Nine apologies,
Eight mags a milking,
Up to seven Gitmo terrorists,
At least six Clintonistas,
Five tax “things.”
Four prime-time primpings,
Three emboldened thugs,
Two broke automakers,
And a country heading into bankruptcy.


[1] – Actually more, if you count those who didn’t get their nominations submitted or who weren’t confirmed. There are at least Geithner, Daschle, Solis, Kirk, and Sebelius.


UPDATE: CNN is very late to the game. What they’re trying to call SWAGGA, which is really a false projected self-confidence based on lack of substance, I’ve been calling PUNK from the beginning. Once again, yours truly was a pioneer. :–>

UPDATE 2: Here’s a transcript of Obama’s “100 Days” speech.

Chrysler files for bankruptcy

News link.

Immediate thoughts: Now we have the prospect of:

  • $8 billion more of taxpayers’ money down the tubes.
  • The United Auto Workers running an auto comany, and ….
  • Representing a competitor’s workers (Ford’s) at the bargaining table.

For all the back-and-forth in Washington about conflict of interest in the most piddling situations, this is a historical doozy that is somehow no problemo. What it is, is an outrage. If I were Ford, I would oppose Chrysler’s apparent plan for bankruptcy emergence tooth and nail as a matter of survival.

Lucid Links (043009, Morning)

Filed under: Lucid Links — Tom @ 9:48 am

Noteworthy Net-Worthies:

Supporting the point made in this post Tuesday about newspaper circulation, namely that the New York Times sees Obama worship as a survival strategy, a Times reporter Twittered (HT Michelle Malkin) that the company “has sold $2 million worth of obama merchandise.” No conflict of interest there, eh? It’s as if he’s the local sports team. Zheesh.

Sherrod Brown’s vote to support proabort radical Kathleen “No Abortionist Left Behind” Sebelius was not a surprise (roll call here). George Voinovich’s Spectervich’s was, and is a bitter disappointment coming from someone whose sole remaining legitimate claim to conservative values is supposedly being prolife. It’s further evidence that the 17th Amendment was a mistake that should be undone (and probably never will be). Before it, senators could be recalled from Washington by their legislatures. The 17th has no recall provision. Lame ducks can do anything they want with impunity for conceivably up to six years, and are not subject to recall. The Founders gave great deference to senators, but they did not expect them to turn into multi-year untouchables.

Related — A (PDF) letter signed by 32 congressmen urged President Obama to withdraw the Sebelius nomination, because “During her time in public office she has she has worked against even such modest (life-protecting) measures as parental notification, waiting periods, and informed consent.” That letter didn’t have the signatures of Steve Driehaus, who claims to be prolife and objectively is not, or John Boccieri, who won’t even answer direct life-related questions. Don’t give me any crap about the list being all GOP, if indeed it is. If that’s the excuse, the absence of the two Ohio Democrats’ signatures is strong evidence that Driehaus’s and Boccieri’s party is more important than their principles.

Great historical point that needs repeating, especially because the Left can’t handle it — The Mathew Shepard murder was not a hate crime (“What it came down to really is drugs and money and two punks that were out looking for it”; HT Brad Wilmouth at NewsBusters). As would be expected, Keith Olbermann went ballistic over this evidence-based claim. Update: Invincible Armor elaborates nicely.

If the Bush administration had done the incredibly stupid Manhattan fly-by (which, because they had common sense, they would never have even considered), it would have supplanted swine flu as the most important story of the past few days. Doug Powers notes an error in the apology.

Ira Einhorn lawyer Arlen Specter became a Democrat primarily because of Pat Toomey. So “obviously,” someone else besides Toomey has to run against Specter in the general. This is pathetic.

In his 100th day town hall meeting set-up yesterday, Obama said, of the tea parties that he was said to be unaware of, that “I am happy to have a serious conversation about how we are going to cut our health care costs down over the long term, how we are going to stabilize Social Security.” Well, the National Tea Party Coalition has accepted his offer. Put up or shut up, pal.