Great Dane: Denmark’s Parliament’s Speaker Expresses ‘Serious Doubts’ About ‘Climate Change’
Normally, it’s news when a leading politician in a country hosting a summit expresses harsh dissent against that summit’s agenda — or at least it is when a leftist is the dissenter.
But I doubt that what Thor Pedersen, Speaker of the Danish Parliament, has to say about the upcoming COP15 Climate Summit will get much if any play in U.S. network newscasts or in the nation’s establishment media publications of record.
As reported in Politiken.dk, self-described here as “one of Denmark’s largest newspapers and has been published since 1884,” Pedersen pushes back against the global warming pap:
The Speaker of the Danish Parliament has issued a damning criticism of the climate debate, saying politicians gullibly turn theories into facts.
As the world prepares to converge on Copenhagen for the COP15 Climate Summit, Denmark’s Speaker of Parliament has expressed serious doubts as to the way in which the climate debate has developed.
“The problem is that lots of people go around saying that the climate change we see is a result of human activity. That is a very dangerous claim,” Parliamentary Speaker and former Finance Minister Thor Pedersen (Lib) tells DR.
“Unfortunately I seem to experience that scientists say: ‘We have a theory’ – then that crosses the road to the politicians who say: ‘We know’. Who can be bothered to hear a scientist who says ‘I have a theory’ when politicians go around saying ‘I know’” Thor Pedersen says.
Thor Pedersen adds that the temperature has not risen in the past decade.
“I’m not saying that in the decade that the temperature has fallen or stagnated is enough to evaluate developments. But one should only say what one knows,” the Speaker adds.
“You should say that although we believed in our models, that the temperature would rise from 1998 to 2008, we have to admit that it has not risen. We cannot explain why it has not risen, but we believe we still have a problem. I’m just asking that people say what they actually know,” Pedersen tells DR.
Given what has been exposed in ClimateGate, Pedersen is actually giving climate change scientists more of a break than they deserve. It’s clear from the e-mails exposed that many of these scientists have made up their minds and have in many cases been pretending to know what they don’t really know.
Nonetheless, a Danish voice of dissent is quite welcome in advance of Copenhagen’s Conference of Denialists, i.e., those who are denying that the ClimateGate scandal exposes the utter lack of scientific support for the conference’s topic.
Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org.
comments regarding media coverage in the USA can be reflected here in the UK. The media channels seem to adopt the same principle applied to the Holocaust. It dare not be doubted…and yet there are enough of the general public who question the evidence but would give scientist the chance to prove their belief. As in a court both sides of the prosecution must be heard, not just in the UK but in all developed industrial nations. If evidence comes from the so called under developed nations then we must demonstrate they have a case for climate change support, and not one of eco-social desires for financial help from the capitalist nations, backrupted now by greed, through exploitation and manipulation of their (THIRD WORLD) raw materials.
If as the climate change data is suppose to show, the problem has accelerated in the past 40 years let us revist the effect a projectile has on a ball of gas, when that projectile is fired from the centre of the gas ball, through it. Do the gases get sucked through the hole , made by the projectile, leaving a depletion inside the gas ball. Can it suck out Carbon neutralising gases?
If the one polar cap is melting at the Alarming rate what happens to the water that results/ How long will it take form the water to redistribute evenly. Can an uneven distribution cause a short term, or worse a long term instability of the earths rotational operandi. i.e Will a rapid melt alter the earths rotational. This could result in a greater disater than the slow global climate change.
Comment by john goodyear — December 5, 2009 @ 10:57 am
#1, I’m taking your comment not as Holocaust denial, but as globalarmists treating those who doubt them as the environmental equivalents of Holocaust deniers (there are several including Al Gore who have mouthed such debate shutting-down sentiments).
Comment by TBlumer — December 6, 2009 @ 9:29 am