Great catch by Taranto at the WSJ’s Best of the Web on Obama’s Afghanistan speech:
Little wonder Obama also said in his speech that “the wrenching debate over the Iraq war is well-known and need not be repeated here.” That’s easier than admitting that he has changed his mind and now regards Iraq as having been an al Qaeda safe haven and source of international terrorism.
This is yet another in a long, long line of instances where the Left casually discards what it once considered core arguments when it becomes convenient and/or expedient to do so. That’s what happens when your real core values consist only of power and control.
The hope is that the rest of us will forget their previous contradictory dictums. That worked pretty well 20 years ago. Taranto has demonstrated that it doesn’t work any more.
______________________________________________________
Hapless Hannity — I thought that Sean Hannity would stop going after Alicia, one of his assistants who recently got married, once she tied the knot. Before she got married, up to just days before her wedding, Hannity wasted precious broadcast minutes seemingly every day trying to talk her out of marrying her beau.
I was wrong. He was after her yet again yesterday about some kind of argument the now-married couple may or may not have had.
Hannity obviously thinks this is entertaining. Maybe it was, for five minutes on one day, many months ago. But now this non-stop harassment is enough to make you wonder if he believes in what he says about family values.
Sean, leave the couple alone.
Heaven help us if Rush ever goes off the air and Hannity is considered conservative talk’s leading light.
Hannity at least seems to have stopped trying to push “the new GM” onto his listeners. The sad thing is that in my opinion he had to hear from listeners and read posts from bloggers (or more likely to have his peeps do it for him) before he figured out that supporting a bailed-out, state-run company betrays sensible conservatism.
______________________________________________________
Quick Climategate Update, from James Delingpole at the UK Telegraph — “It’s All Unravelling Now.”
While on the subject, it’s interesting how the press continues to characterize the information taken as “hacked,” as in obtained in an electronic break-in by outsiders, when the evidence points to at least an equal chance that it was surreptitiously spirited away by an insider. If it’s the latter, the person who did is this decade’s Daniel Ellsberg, in a heist with far more valuable substance than Ellsberg’s purloined Pentagon Papers ever revealed.
_______________________________________________________
Speaking of the AP article linked in the previous item, there’s this gem at the end:
The chairman of the Academy of Science panel, Texas A&M University atmospheric scientist Gerald North, said even if (Climategate e-mail authors/data cookers) Jones, Mann and others had done no research at all, the world would still be warming and scientists would still be able to show it.
I read the bolded text as an admission that “we can’t show it now.”
In other words, there’s no other convincing evidence. In other words, nothing’s “settled.” In other words, Copenhagen is a pointless waste of time and money.
_______________________________________________________
Speaking of Copenhagen and Denmark — “Denmark rife with CO2 fraud”:
Police and authorities in several European countries are investigating scams worth billions of kroner, which all originate in the Danish quota register. The CO2 quotas are traded in other EU countries.
Denmark’s quota register, which the Energy Agency within the Climate and Energy Ministry administers, is the largest in the world in terms of personal quota registrations. It is much easier to register here than in other countries, where it can take up to three months to be approved.
Ekstra Bladet reporters have found examples of people using false addresses and companies that are in liquidation, which haven’t been removed from the register.
One of the cases, which stems from the Danish register, involves fraud of more than 8 billion kroner.
At roughly 5 kroners/dollar, that’s about $1.6 billion, which is roughly $300 for every man, woman and child in Denmark.
The Danish debacle is a prelude of things to come on a much larger scale if the “trade” part of cap and trade ever becomes a worldwide reality.