August 29, 2011

AP’s Pace, Covering Krueger Nomination: Obama Struggles With ‘Perceptions the Economy Is Stuck in Low Gear’

Maybe AP stands for “Alternative Planet.”

In an early version of Julie Pace’s coverage of President Obama’s selection of Alan Krueger to be the next head of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, the following paragraph appeared (bolds are mine):

The decision completes a wholesale shake-up of the team that Obama brought with him to the White House over three years ago. Advisers Larry Summers, Christina Romer and Goolsbee have now all departed, and Obama continues to struggle with perceptions the economy is stuck in low gear on his watch.

Two obvious points:

  1. Obama has been President for just over 31 months, which is over five months short of “over three years ago.” It has been about a week short of 34 months since he won the presidential election and started acting like he was already president during the Bush-Obama transition. It only feels like it’s been over three years, Julie — wayyyyy over three years, while the Obama administration’s policies have set industries like housing back by decades.
  2. In Pace’s Place on Planet AP, Obama’s problem isn’t that the economy is sputtering; it’s just the perception that it is. The economy’s average annualized growth this year of less than 1% is some kind of mirage.

Actually, there’s a name for the planet on which Pace and a large and influential portion of the wire service which employs her reside: Planet DC. In that never-never land, Gallup’s Economic Confidence Index is at +11. Meanwhile, each of the 50 states has a confidence index of -13 or lower. Additionally, as noted by Catherine Rampell at the New York Times:

In every state, a majority of residents think the economy is getting worse. In the nation’s capital, however, a full 60 percent of people think the economy is getting better.

This may be good evidence for those arguing that Washington exists in its own disconnected bubble.

Or, in other words, on Planet DC, a land made rich largely on the backs of the 50 states from which it receives its sustenance.

Planet DC has two aspects. Its current condition is one where things are great no matter what the silly economic data says. On the other hand, when a Republican or conservative is in the White House, as was the case during the eight years before President Obama took office, I don’t recall the press ever claiming that George W. Bush’s economy was facing “perception” problems. In fact, Planet DC’s media residents worked tirelessly to create negative and largely false economic perceptions during those years.

Pace’s early errors are in the process of being washed clean and flushed down the media memory hole in the AP’s updates. A Google web search on the second bolded segment above (in quotes) returned 68 items without duplicates at about 1:30 p.m. But clicking on many and perhaps most of the results returned (examples here and here) brings one to an updated version of Pace’s story without the timing error and “perception” howler. A Google News search on the same string returns only one item at NPR.com which as of 1:40 p.m. hadn’t been revised.

You see, in addition to having no accountability for differentially reporting on the economic performance of presidents regardless of the underlying economic reality (Republicans/conservatives – “weak,” “trying to avoid a recession”; Democrats – “booming,” — or if not, “struggling with perceptions”), being on Planet AP means almost never having to say you’re sorry.

Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org.

Share

4 Comments

  1. Good Morning Tom,
    Have you read The Papal Encyclical “Rerum Novarum”?
    It was Given by Pope Leo XIII on May 15, 1891
    Here is the Link:

    http://www.fisheaters.com/rerumnovarum.html

    Comment by Gregory — August 30, 2011 @ 12:44 am

  2. Tom,

    It is interesting to read this linked article and the comments too.
    Please read it and tell me what you think. There are things I like about Ron Paul and things I think are strange, but i’m realistic enough to know there is no perfect canidate. So I give it the ole smell test, and really the standard Republican fare stinks to high heaven. Again, please read it and tell me what you think.
    Thanks – Greg

    http://www.creativeminorityreport.com/2011/08/ron-paul-is-idiot.html

    Comment by Gregory — August 30, 2011 @ 1:20 am

  3. Tom, Here is very good article by Fr. James V. Schall, S. J.
    It is called: “On the Fragility of Islam”

    Would you say Fr. James take on the Middle east and Islam backs up Ron Paul’s approach to Foreign policy or the “Neo Con” pro war Party for Endless oil, Warfare, Welfare party? Hmm?

    http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/on-the-fragility-of-islam.html

    Comment by Greg — August 30, 2011 @ 10:05 am

  4. #3, Nice try, no sale.

    The good priest somehow thinks that JP2 made communism fall on his own. He was a critical influence, and arguably as important or slightly moreso than Reagan.

    But Soviet Communism fell not only because of moral suasion, which was important, but also because Reagan made it clear that it would have to bankrupt itself to survive, and that he would not tolerate a replay of Czechoslovakia in Poland or elsewhere.

    The idea that Islamic states will ever fail on their own and suddenly embrace modern civilization once someone “proves” that the Koran without being pushed or helped along in a meaningful way is a bunch of crap that is as absurd as the idea that communist dictatorships fall on their own without sufficient pressure. Exhibit A: Cuba. Exhibit B: North Korea.

    What this has to do with Ron Paul I find mysterious.

    Comment by TBlumer — August 30, 2011 @ 10:32 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.