Plenty of Dems Can’t Handle Obama’s Tax Proposals
Including Chuckie Schumer.
From a Wall Street Journal editorial this morning (bolds are mine):
… the conventional wisdom has it that the President is trying to emulate Harry Truman by setting up a “do-nothing Congress” as a re-election foil.
But the bigger news may be how much resistance Mr. Obama’s ideas are drawing from the Democrats who control the Senate. Senators from energy-producing states object to targeting oil and gas companies. “Just picking out one industry is not acceptable,” said Alaska’s Mark Begich. Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu added: “That offset is not going to fly, and [Mr. Obama] should know that.”
Even New York’s Chuck Schumer, of all unlikely partisans, has objections—notably to Mr. Obama’s plan to allow the Bush tax cuts to expire on taxpayers earning more than $200,000 (or $250,000 for married couples): “$250,000 makes you really rich in Mississippi, but it doesn’t make you rich at all in New York, and there ought to be some kind of scale based on the cost of living on how much you pay.”
Mr. Schumer didn’t mention that one reason for the cost-of-living differential is the Empire State’s own sky-high taxes, but the important political point is that the Democratic Party’s chief Wall Street fund-raiser is tacitly acknowledging that raising taxes on the not-so-rich isn’t popular.
Other Senate Democrats don’t like the President’s basic priorities. “Tax increases have to come second to cutting [spending],” said Ben Nelson of Nebraska, perhaps the most vulnerable Democrat up for re-election next year. “I was just home over the weekend and that’s what [my constituents] were all talking about.”
Delaware’s Tom Carper, who ought to have an easier time retaining his seat, said: “I think the best jobs bill that can be passed is a comprehensive long-term deficit-reduction plan. That’s better than everything else the president is talking about—combined.”
Not all of the objecting Democrats are concerned about their own re-election. Virginia’s Jim Webb, who is retiring, called the President’s tax proposals “terrible,” adding: “We shouldn’t increase taxes on ordinary income. . . . There are other ways to get there.”
The Independent Democrat Joe Lieberman told a reporter from his home state of Connecticut that Mr. Obama’s plan “doesn’t represent the kind of comprehensive tax reform, entitlement reform and spending reduction that we need to get our country back into balance. And to me, therefore, it doesn’t pass the test. And I don’t think it can be passed.”
Yet Obama and his press apparatchiks believe that reelection success can be based by emulating Harry Truman and running against a “do-nothing (Republican) Congress.”
Sadly, the population of dependents is so high that his reelection remains possible, but the theme is going to have to be something different. Unlike in 1948, Republicans only have the House. And unlike 1948, the Republicans have passed meaningful economic proposals. The fact that the Senate and President don’t like them doesn’t change that fact, or its signficance.
So I figure that I need to catch up on the LightSquared saga. This is the company which, as Fox News 









