November 8, 2011

AP’s Pathetic Excuse for Not Reporting Sarkozy-Obama Netanyahu Snipes: ‘French Media Tradition’

MonkeySeeHearSpeakNoEvilAre we supposed to believe standards of professional journalism are so different in France that when you hear something clearly newsworthy, you don’t say or write about it when the government tells you not to because of “tradition”?

That’s what Angela Charlton at the Associated Press, which admits to having had a reporter on hand when French President Nicolas Sarkozy told U.S. President Barack Obama that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “is a liar,” would have us believe. Though she did note Obama’s lack of objection to Sarkozy’s assertion, Charlton downplayed Obama’s actual and equally broad response — “You’re fed up with him, but I have to deal with him every day!” — by holding it until the eighth paragraph of her report and keeping it out of the story’s headline. The first six paragraphs of the report (9:45 a.m. version also saved here for future reference, fair use and discussion purposes), which includes the excuse, follow the jump (bolds are mine):

Sarkozy overheard telling Obama Netanyahu’s a liar

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who has labored to improve French relations with Israel, said he “can’t stand” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and called him a liar in a chat with President Barack Obama.

The conversation between Sarkozy and Obama was overheard by reporters last week at the Group of 20 summit in southern France, via headsets that were to be used for simultaneous translation of an upcoming news conference.

Obama, whose remarks were heard via a French translation, was not heard objecting to Sarkozy’s characterization of Netanyahu. Through the interpreter, Obama was heard asking Sarkozy to help persuade the Palestinians to stop their efforts to gain U.N. recognition of a Palestinian state.

Several French-speaking journalists, including one from The Associated Press, overheard the comments but did not initially report them because Sarkozy’s office had asked the journalists not to turn on the headsets until the press conference began, and the comments were deemed private under French media traditions.

A French website that analyzes media coverage of current affairs, Arret sur images, reported the fragments Tuesday.

Sarkozy’s office would not comment Tuesday on the remarks, or on France’s relations with Israel. The White House and Netanyahu’s spokesman also said they had no comment.

So it looks like what could be seen as a French counterpart to NewsBusters may be the only reason why the comments got into the open at all.

Questions simliar to those I posed last night (at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog) remain quite pertinent:

  • How can anybody in the New Media Age believe that something like this would go unreported?
  • Who in the world elected these people the world’s information gatekeepers?
  • What self-respecting journalist, at least in a society with a representative government which depends on aggressive media coverage to adequately inform the public (which France supposedly is), would choose to ignore and fail to report what was said?

The clear suspicion here is that if the players had been different — say a Republican or conservative U.S. president, or even anyone other than Barack Obama — we would not have seen similar restraint exercised by the journalists involved — regardless of “French media tradition.”

In fact, Charlton cites a similar instance where an open microphone didn’t matter: “At a Group of Eight summit in 2006, an open microphone caught then-British Prime Minister Tony Blair appearing subservient to President George W. Bush, who greeted him by shouting, ‘Yo, Blair!’” If the G-8 summits typically attempt similar journalistic restraints, there surely wasn’t any journalistic holdback in evidence on this one, was there?

Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org.

Share

9 Comments

  1. Nice the picture………..
    Where is the shameless Herman Cain Promotion?

    Comment by G — November 8, 2011 @ 2:25 pm

  2. Do you have something substantive to say?

    Oh, and I’ll ask again: Do you want me to withdraw you comment about Giuliani?

    Comment by TBlumer — November 8, 2011 @ 2:40 pm

  3. Giuliani?
    Giuliani is a RINO
    He would be a better Democrat than Republican.

    Comment by G — November 8, 2011 @ 5:11 pm

  4. Rudy Giuliani is a CINO also

    http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2007/apr/07041705

    http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/apr/08042803

    Comment by G — November 8, 2011 @ 5:22 pm

  5. Tom, Rudy wants everyone to work……………..

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/04/giuliani_ows_is_millstone_around_obamas_neck_that_will_take_presidency_down.html

    Tom, the Germans want everyone to work too…………
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbeit_macht_frei

    What Rudy seems to forget is that is that many folks are looking to work but can’t find it and that seems to be okay with the major corporations and congres that want the middle class to go away…..

    Skousen: Actual Unemployment Rate Is at ‘Great Depression Level’

    http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Skousen-Unemployment-Depression-Level/2011/11/07/id/417144

    Comment by G — November 8, 2011 @ 5:32 pm

  6. #3, #4, well-known, old news.

    The question still stands: Do you want me to withdraw your comment about Giuliani?

    Specifically:
    Mr Giuliani, the only thing that is fitting to say to you is this.

    “Arbeit macht frei”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbeit_macht_frei

    The translation is of three words at the Nazi death camps: “Work sets (you) free.”

    Comment by Tom Blumer — November 8, 2011 @ 5:38 pm

  7. So, our comments crossed.

    I’m taking your 5:32 comment to mean that you won’t withdraw your comment likening Giuliani to a Nazi death camp operator. Am I correct? Yes or no? Clarification: Based on #5 above, which could be interpreted as a “no,” I’m going to take your continuing to refuse to answer as a “no.”

    Comment by TBlumer — November 8, 2011 @ 5:41 pm

  8. History repeats for those who forget.
    Words have consequences
    GOD spoke the world into existence.
    Words are powerful.
    Not all OWS protestors are moral degenerates.
    There are valid issues and these issues need to see the light of day.
    Not all big corporations are thieves working to steal our influence and votebut its pretty hard to find one these days that isn’t
    Not all congressmen are addicted to power and money and spending like a drunken sailor but its pretty hard to find one these days that isn’t There is nothing to retract. Giuliani and the Nazi Germans like to Moralize about work.
    It should cause us to wake up.

    Comment by G — November 8, 2011 @ 5:59 pm

  9. Hoo-kay.

    Good-bye, Greg. Have a great life and Godspeed.

    Comment by TBlumer — November 8, 2011 @ 6:58 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.