Rules are here. Possible comment fodder follows. Other topics are also fair game.
__________________________________________
Fox News’s exit polls, which are laid out in a confusing way, do NOT say that more Democrats than Republicans voted for Ron Paul, as many bloggers and others are wrongly claiming.
They DO say that of all Democrats who voted in the GOP primary, making up 4% of all those who voted, 25% of them voted for Paul. With about 250,000 ballots cast (actually about 248,200, but I’m rounding for ease of understanding), that means Paul got 2,500 votes from Democrats out of about 10,000 cast.
Mitt Romney got 14% of the Democrats’ votes, or about 1,400. John Huntsman got 40%, or about 4,000. Huntsman’s Dem support component was by far the highest (about 4,000 Dems, 12,500 Reps, and 26,000 Indies).
The exit poll also says that Paul was the winner among independents, garnering 31% of their votes to Romney’s 30%.
__________________________________________
Sorry, Mitt, you’re not getting away with lowering expectations in South Carolina. The meme is that he might lose, but it’s no big deal. Baloney. If he loses, it means he will have squandered a double-digit polling lead he’s held in every major 2012 poll.
__________________________________________
In the New York Post — “At the Detroit Auto Show this week, CEO Dan Akerson admitted that General Motors may have to cut back production of the Chevrolet Volt because the 4,600-plus Volts on the market now are about three times the monthly sales. Other figures put the GM hybrid car’s inventory at an outrageous 120-plus days.” If the bean counters were told to allocate each Volt an appropriate amount for management’s time and attention, the product would be even more millions in the red than it already is.
__________________________________________
If unemployment claims return to 400,000-plus next week for the second week in a row (after yesterday’s 399K gets almost inevitably revised upward), it will be worse news qualitatively considering where should be in a “recovery” than the 400K+ numbers from a year ago. That’s because the workforce, as shown in the graph at Investor’s Business Daily, is still in shrink mode — something which did not happen in any other Post-World War II recovery:

Rebound? What Rebound?