February 26, 2012

Not News: Koch Bros. Hit Back at Laughably False Obama For America Email

Imagine if a Republican campaign organization attempted to raise money by going after billionaire Barack Obama fan Warren Buffett by claiming that Buffett is making a lot of money at the pump because of higher gas prices. The press would immediately pounce and say that it’s not true, because even though Buffett could be benefiting from the President’s cancellation of the Keystone Pipeline, the Odious Oracle of Omaha doesn’t own enterprises which sell gas at retail.

Well, Team Obama at the Obama For America campaign organization just did the same thing to the Koch Brothers a couple of days ago, and as expected, we haven’t heard a peep from the establishment press about the related blatantly false email. A search on “Koch” at the Associated Press’s main national web site returns nothing relevant, which is also the case with the same search at the New York Times. What follows is the text of the email I received on Friday morning (also seen here), plus the Koch Brothers’ full response (bolds are mine throughout this post):

In just about 24 hours, Mitt Romney is headed to a hotel ballroom to give a speech sponsored by Americans for Prosperity, a front group founded and funded by the Koch brothers.

Those are the same Koch brothers whose business model is to make millions by jacking up prices at the pump, and who have bankrolled Tea Party extremism and committed $200 million to try to destroy President Obama before Election Day.

So in the hours before Romney courts two men obsessed with making Barack Obama a one-term president, let’s see how many of us can chip in to the Two-Term Fund.

This number will update every five minutes to show how many people give in the 24 hours until Romney greets the Kochs:

Donate to the Two-Term Fund today.

Here’s what Mitt Romney told his supporters just after his victory in the Florida GOP primary:

“We must not forget what this election is really about: defeating Barack Obama.”

Pitch in $3 or more over the next 24 hours to show that, while that message may fire up two oil-industry billionaires, it’s also one that plenty of us are tired of hearing …

Thanks,

Jim Messina
Campaign Manager
Obama for America

The Kochs’ response later Friday absolutely shreds Messina’s shrieking claims (reproduced in full):

A Letter to the Obama Campaign

Dear Mr. Messina:

Because every American has the right to take part in the public discourse on matters that affect the future of our country, I feel compelled to respond directly about a fundraising letter you sent out on February 24 denouncing Koch. It is both surprising and disappointing that the President would allow his re-election team to send such an irresponsible and misleading letter to his supporters.

For example, it is false that our “business model is to make millions by jacking up prices at the pump.” Our business vision begins and ends with value creation — real, long-term value for customers and for society. We own no gasoline stations and the part of our business you allude to, oil and gas refining, actually lowers the price of gasoline by increasing supply. Either you simply misunderstand the way commodities markets work or you are misleading your supporters and the rest of the American people.

Contrary to your assertion that we have “committed $200 million to try to destroy President Obama,” we have stated publicly and repeatedly since last November that we have never made any such claim or pledge. It is hard to imagine that the campaign is unaware of our publicly stated position on that point. Similarly, Americans for Prosperity is not simply “funded by the Koch brothers,” as you state — rather it has tens of thousands of members and contributors from across the country and from all walks of life. Further, our opposition to this President’s policies is not based on partisan politics but on principles. Charles Koch and David Koch have been outspoken advocates of the free-market for over 50 years and they have consistently opposed policies that frustrate or subvert free markets, regardless of whether a Democrat or a Republican was President.

If the President’s campaign has some principled disagreement with the arguments we are making publicly about the staggering debt the President and previous administrations have imposed on the country, the regulations that are stifling business growth and innovation, the increasing intrusion of government into nearly every aspect of American life, we would be eager to hear them. But it is an abuse of the President’s position and does a disservice to our nation for the President and his campaign to criticize private citizens simply for the act of engaging in their constitutional right of free speech about important matters of public policy. The implication in that sort of attack is obvious: dare to criticize the President’s policies and you will be singled out and personally maligned by the President and his campaign in an effort to chill free speech and squelch dissent.

This is not the first time that the President and his Administration have engaged in this sort of disturbing behavior. As far back as August, 2010, Austan Goolsbee, then the President’s chief economic advisor, made public comments concerning Koch’s tax status and falsely stated that the company did not pay income tax, which triggered a federal investigation into Mr. Goolsbee’s conduct that potentially implicated federal law against improper disclosure of taxpayer information. Last June, your colleagues sent fundraising letters disparaging us as “plotting oil men” bent on “misleading people” with “disinformation” in order to “smear” the President’s record. Those accusations were baseless and were made at the very same time the president was publicly calling for a more “civil conversation” in the country.

It is understandable that the President and his campaign may be “tired of hearing” that many Americans would rather not see the president re-elected. However, the inference is that you would prefer that citizens who disagree with the President and his policies refrain from voicing their own viewpoint. Clearly, that’s not the way a free society should operate.

We agree with the President that civil discourse is an American strength. That is why it is troubling to see a national political campaign apparently target individual citizens and private companies for some perceived political advantage. I also hope the President will reflect on how the approach the campaign is using is at odds with our national values and the constitutional right to free speech.

The only press coverage I’ve seen thus far is at the Politico.

That doesn’t cut it. The Politico is very often the place where stories the press should be giving general coverage go to die — at which point, the rest of the press says, “See, we don’t have to mention it, because it’s already at the Politico.” Horse manure.

This is an enabling situation. OFA hacks like Messina know they can promulgate anything with little in the way of press repercussions, which encourage them to push the envelope even further.

Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org.

Share

6 Comments

  1. Obama has a long track record of assailing private citizens for expressing their contrary opinions, just ask Joe (Sam) the Plumber. The liberal MO, the ad hominem, if you can’t muster a counter argument then obfuscate by debasing the person making the argument.

    The point is Obama already lost the argument, the issue is can he confuse enough people to think it is in their personal interest to vote for him or not vote against him. Hence Obama’s campaign strategy, 50% + 1. If enough people fear the GOP will toss them to the wolves by cutting government then those collecting food stamps, unemployment and other government services plus those who directly work for government will vote for Obama. Be careful you don’t fall for the trap regarding the Koch brothers as spending most of your time defending against false accusations. That’s the purpose of a false accusation to obfuscate and divert time and attention.

    The bulk of our time should be spent convincing those on the government dole that while they are naturally thankful for having washed up on a deserted island in their hour of need, it should be pointed out that the island while keeping them from drowning is also keeping them from getting to the mainland. Those who get stranded on a deserted island are greatful to be saved but then spend their time and energy barely surviving and trying to get OFF the island. Being marooned on the government dole does not allow you to live according to your hopes and desires.

    What Obama has done is to tell people stuck on the tiny spit of land is to be envious and resentful of those who live on the mainland. Never mind it was Obama who torpedoed their boat to strand them in the middle of nowhere with no hope of ever being rescued.

    If the President’s campaign has some principled disagreement with the arguments we are making publicly about the staggering debt the President and previous administrations have imposed on the country, the regulations that are stifling business growth and innovation, the increasing intrusion of government into nearly every aspect of American life, we would be eager to hear them.

    IF we have won the argument by this message then spend most of the time on message by elaborating the details of every policy failure.

    Comment by dscott — February 27, 2012 @ 8:53 am

  2. Speaking oil and failed unsustainable policies:

    TransCanada Corp. to begin construction of Keystone pipeline

    http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/212715-transcanada-to-begin-construction-of-keystone-pipeline

    The company told the State Department in a letter Monday that it will begin construction of a section of the pipeline that runs from Cushing, Okla., to refineries on the Gulf Coast. The stand-alone portion of the project, which TransCanada dubbed the Gulf Coast Project, will cost $2.3 billion and will be completed in mid-to-late 2013, according to the company. The project must still receive other regulatory approvals.

    Reading between the lines, TransCanada has figured Obama won’t be re-elected and thus the Obama Regime with no viable political reason to block a US domestic pipeline can’t afford to hinder a pipeline where there are no “environmental” issues between specific segments. Thus their project will stay on track for the next 11 months until Jan 2013.

    It should be noted even if the inconceivable happens for Obama to be re-elected, TransCanada is still going to make money on this segment of the pipeline even IF they never are allowed to go north to Canada from Oklahoma. That little poke in the eye must have hurt…

    Comment by dscott — February 27, 2012 @ 2:49 pm

  3. Ouch indeed.

    Comment by TBlumer — February 27, 2012 @ 2:56 pm

  4. In reference to #1, the message that should be repeated ad infinitum:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOpwCQsMbCE&feature=player_embedded

    In fact, if you could have it open automatically in a separate widow when someone opens your site. Remember, the louder a liberal screams and the more he/she dissembles or spins, the closer to the mark your arrow has struck.

    Comment by dscott — February 27, 2012 @ 5:10 pm

  5. [...] Not News: Koch Bros. Hit Back at Laughably False Obama For America Email [...]

    Pingback by Not News: Koch Bros. Hit Back at Laughably False Obama For America Email | PERSUASION IN INK — February 28, 2012 @ 7:36 pm

  6. [...] Not News: Koch Bros. Hit Back at Laughably False Obama For America Email [...]

    Pingback by Wednesday Afternoon Grumpy Daily News Headlines | Grumpy Opinions — February 29, 2012 @ 1:36 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.