<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politico&#8217;s Cirilli, Others Ignore Heavy Democrat Involvement in Hostess Ownership and Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2012/11/17/ap-politico-ignore-heavy-democrat-involvement-in-hostess-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2012/11/17/ap-politico-ignore-heavy-democrat-involvement-in-hostess-management/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow-Up: Politico's Cirilli, Others Ignore Heavy Democrat Involvement in Hostess Ownership and Management &#124; What Am I Missing Here?</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2012/11/17/ap-politico-ignore-heavy-democrat-involvement-in-hostess-management/comment-page-1/#comment-170709</link>
		<dc:creator>Follow-Up: Politico's Cirilli, Others Ignore Heavy Democrat Involvement in Hostess Ownership and Management &#124; What Am I Missing Here?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=62143#comment-170709</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com. Be Sociable, Share!           Tweet &#160;Print This Post  &#160;Send To A Friend    Article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com. Be Sociable, Share!           Tweet &nbsp;Print This Post  &nbsp;Send To A Friend    Article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zf</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2012/11/17/ap-politico-ignore-heavy-democrat-involvement-in-hostess-management/comment-page-1/#comment-170673</link>
		<dc:creator>zf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 01:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=62143#comment-170673</guid>
		<description>In regards to a comment from the union (which one? probably the Bakers I assume) that management was fine with the pensions after the first bankruptcy that takes a lot of chutzpah. They were trying to keep the company afloat without a) ticking the union off and b) trying to not have to keep you from your precious pension money. Unbelievable that the Union would throw that back in the company&#039;s face. Hey, your way didn&#039;t work, but you stubbornly kept going. What twits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to a comment from the union (which one? probably the Bakers I assume) that management was fine with the pensions after the first bankruptcy that takes a lot of chutzpah. They were trying to keep the company afloat without a) ticking the union off and b) trying to not have to keep you from your precious pension money. Unbelievable that the Union would throw that back in the company&#8217;s face. Hey, your way didn&#8217;t work, but you stubbornly kept going. What twits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zf</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2012/11/17/ap-politico-ignore-heavy-democrat-involvement-in-hostess-management/comment-page-1/#comment-170669</link>
		<dc:creator>zf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 19:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=62143#comment-170669</guid>
		<description>Amazing, even with a union ally trying to save the show, the Baker Union (for short, the actual name is really long) still wouldn&#039;t play ball. And apparently there was a disagreement between the Teamsters and the Bakers, so now unions don&#039;t even play well with each other anymore. I wonder which union is going to claim the other one threw them under the bus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing, even with a union ally trying to save the show, the Baker Union (for short, the actual name is really long) still wouldn&#8217;t play ball. And apparently there was a disagreement between the Teamsters and the Bakers, so now unions don&#8217;t even play well with each other anymore. I wonder which union is going to claim the other one threw them under the bus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
