March 10, 2013

AP’s Crutsinger: Employers Are on a ‘Hiring Spree,’ and Job Market Is ‘Accelerating,’ One Month After Serious Jan. Dip

At the Associated Press, aka the Administration’s Press, Martin Crutsinger’s treatment of the February employment report released on Friday was pretty much the slavering soliloquy one would have expected.

Crutsinger described the past four months as a “hiring spree,” and the job market as “accelerating.” Even sticking with the seasonally adjusted figures, that doesn’t stand up well, given that there was a big revised dip in job additions in January. Second, he contended that “Hiring would be rising even faster if governments weren’t shrinking their workforces, as they have been for nearly four years” — as if government hiring and the higher taxes which would accompany it at the state and local levels or the higher amount of deficit financing required at the federal level would have no effect on private employers’ rate of hiring. And no establishment press report is complete without moaning about how goverment employment continues to contract ever so slightly and how impending spending “cuts” which aren’t cuts at all threaten the current wondrous conditions. That’s not all, of course.

(more…)

Our Petty, Country-Be-Damned President

Inflicting pain for political gain.

_______________________________________

This column went up at PJ Media and was teased here at BizzyBlog on Friday.

_______________________________________

Sometimes, the smallest things can be the most revealing.

On Tuesday, the nation — or at least the part that’s still paying attention — learned that President Barack Obama’s administration, in what can only be seen as an incredibly petty and virulently vindictive response to spending “cuts” imposed by sequestration (properly described in most cases as “reductions in projected spending increases”), decided to cancel all tours of the White House beginning March 9.

As a result, to name just one of what are surely many examples, sixth graders at an Iowa elementary school which had received approval to take a March 16 tour learned, barring what would seem to be a quixotic effort to change White House minds via Facebook, that it’s not going to happen. They’re reportedly going to make their trip to Washington anyway, because, according to the school’s principal, it’s an important opportunity for them to “find out more about how the government works.” They’ve clearly already learned quite a bit.

So have we.

The tours are run by volunteers. According to an estimate worked up by ABC News on Wednesday, the White House will save $18,000 per week by not utilizing 30 Secret Service agents during the tours. Even that savings figure is suspect, as original reports about the tours’ cancellation claimed that “Uniformed Division Officers assigned to the public tours will be reassigned to other security posts,” which “will reduce overtime costs as well as potential furloughs that could have been required.”

Even if the estimated $936,000 in annual savings ($18,000 times 52 weeks) really occurs, the cancelled tours of what Michelle Obama still calls the People’s House, but which should now be renamed Barack’s Barracks, could have been completely avoided if her husband, knowing that sequestration loomed, hadn’t spent over $1 million on a golf weekend with Tiger Woods in mid-February. A 10 percent less expensive outing would have enabled the tours to continue for another five or six weeks, which would have minimized the last-minute disappointment thousands of children and adults are now experiencing. But why would we expect Mrs. Obama to think of such things, when the tab for just three of her vacations also tops $1 million?

The only conceivable conclusion to draw from all of this is that Barack Obama and his administration don’t give a damn about any suffering their deliberately destructive and disruptive decisions will cause if they believe that they can exploit the related pain for political gain.

It’s far too early to know for sure, but it appears that our Punk President and his Gangster Government have, in this instance and several larger ones, seriously miscalculated in two ways:

  • First, in their belief that the American people won’t come to understand and deeply resent their strategy.
  • Second and unfortunately less likely, in their trust that those who have served as their lapdogs in the press during the past five years going all the way back to the 2008 presidential campaign will continue to consistently cover for them in such egregious circumstances.

On March 1, as he conceded that sequestration was going to take effect with a signature he was under no compulsion to provide, Obama cried wolf over the supposedly imminent sacrifices Capitol janitors and security guards were about to endure:

“Starting tomorrow, everybody here, all the folks who are cleaning the floors at the Capitol … they’re going to have less pay. The janitors, the security guards, they just got a pay cut, and they’ve got to figure out how to manage that. That’s real.”

That was more than Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler could stand. The next day, he gave Obama’s claim “four Pinocchios” (i.e., a “whopper“). His easily obtained evidence was that Capitol officials were so alarmed about the untruthfulness of what Obama said that they rushed out “not true” statements.

Not satisfied that their boss had been caught red-handed, White House officials, including lead Bob Woodward threat deliveryman Gene Sperling and Press Secretary Jay Carney, already in an inescapable hole, kept digging. Each claimed without any apparent attempt to verify the truth of what they were saying that janitors would really be getting a “pay cut” because their overtime would be reduced. Kessler jumped in again on March 6 with another quartet of Pinocchios after finding that “overtime amounts to only pittance of the overall pay — about $6.50 a week on top of wages of $1,000 a week.”

Obviously, very real and major inflictions of pain are afoot. The administration appears to have abandoned the idea of actually governing in favor of spending the next 20 months intimidating voters into changing the party which controls the House of Representatives in next year’s congressional elections. Their crude philosophy appears to be: “The fiscal beatings will continue and morale won’t improve unless and until you elect a Democratic Party majority to the House next year.”

Homeland Security has released and apparently plans on continuing to release thousands of illegal immigrants from detention centers, including many with violent criminal records, and even began doing so before sequestration took effect. Unless these moves cause a meaningful reduction in the number of ICE prison guards, I don’t even see how this move will significantly reduce costs. The Navy has delayed deploying the USS Harry S. Truman to the Persian Gulf, even though “military officials freely admit they could have found ways to save money.” The Navy is also withdrawing its participation in illegal drug interdiction. All three moves make us less safe.  Yet in the midst of all of this, John Kerry had no problem releasing $250 million to the Muslim Brotherhood enclave formerly known as Egypt.

In 2008, Obama’s Republican opponent John McCain used “Country First” as his campaign slogan. Both in that year and during 2012, a truth-in-packaging Obama campaign would have gone with “The Country Be Damned.” That’s what we’re seeing now. It’s unprecedented. It can’t be allowed to work.

Sunday Off-Topic (Moderated) Open Thread (031013)

Filed under: Lucid Links — Tom @ 8:47 am

Rules are here. Possible comment fodder may follow later. Other topics are also fair game.

Positivity: Arkansas passes nation’s broadest abortion restrictions

Filed under: Life-Based News,Positivity — Tom @ 7:42 am

From Little Rock:

Mar 8, 2013 / 05:07 pm

Arkansas legislators have overridden a veto by the governor in order to prohibit most abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy, the earliest ban of any state in the country.

“I feel grateful that people recognize that the abortion policy of this nation has not made abortions rare,” said the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Jason Rapert, in a statement. “In Arkansas, we have now recognized the need for a more balanced policy, and Roe v. Wade has allowed us this option.”

“I am so proud of my fellow legislators for standing up and protecting the lives of unborn children,” he continued. “When there is a heartbeat, there is life.”

The Arkansas Human Heartbeat Protection Act bans nearly all abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy. The so-called “heartbeat bill” is named after its supporters’ argument that unborn babies deserve legal protection once a heartbeat can be identified on an abdominal ultrasound.

The new law – which will go into effect this summer – prohibits abortions if a fetal heartbeat can be detected, except in cases of rape, incest and when the mother’s life is endangered.

State legislatures enacted the bill by overturning the veto of Arkansas governor Mike Beebe with a 56-33 vote in the state House of Representatives and a 20-14 vote in the state Senate.

The passage of the law comes within a week of the Arkansas legislature’s approval of another pro-life bill banning abortion after 20 weeks, the point at which scientific evidence indicates that the unborn can feel pain. That bill was also vetoed by the governor, and the veto was likewise overridden by the legislature, going immediately into effect.

Governor Beebe, who has supported some other laws limiting abortion in the past, cited concerns over the laws’ constitutionality as his primary reason for vetoing the fetal heartbeat bill. Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocacy groups have pledged to fight the legislation. …

Go here for the rest of the story.