February 27, 2014

Initial Unemployment Claims (022714): 348K SA; No Year-Over-Year Change in Raw Claims

Filed under: Economy,Taxes & Government — Tom @ 7:30 am

Predictions:Bloomberg — “Data due today may show jobless claims fell last week by 1,000.” That would mean to 335,000 seasonally adjusted claims from last week’s 336,000 (before revisions which have already been posted and took the number down to 334,000).

Seasonal Adjustment Factors:

  • Week ended Feb. 22, 2014 — 89.2 (yep, the same as last year)
  • Week ended Feb. 23, 2013 — 89.2

Raw Claims:

  • Week ended Feb. 15, 2014 — 321,414 (a reduction from last week’s 323,151)
  • Week ended Feb. 23, 2013 — 310,389

For Bloomberg’s 335K prediction to come true, raw claims will have to be 299K or below (299K divided by .892 is 335K, rounded). That seems aggressive but doable.

We’ll see here at 8:30.

HERE IT IS (permanent link): Looks like it wasn’t doable —


In the week ending February 22, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 348,000, an increase of 14,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 334,000. The 4-week moving average was 338,250, unchanged from the previous week’s revised average.


The advance number of actual initial claims under state programs, unadjusted, totaled 310,816 in the week ending February 22, a decrease of 10,598 from the previous week. There were 310,389 initial claims in the comparable week in 2013.

So there’s essentially no change in raw claims or seasonally adjusted claims from a year ago. Does anyone remember how great the first quarter of last year was? Neither do I.


1 Comment

  1. In related news contributing to your numbers:

    Did Social Security Tax Hikes Kill U.S. Manufacturing Jobs?


    Obviously, automation also had a big impact on manufacturing spurred by the increased tax on labor. Now imagine what ObamaCare’s regs and taxes are going to do…

    One must think back to the Fed’s printing of money and wonder if this is an attempt to devalue the Dollar in order to offset these government imposed hurtles to economic output? What better way to hide the devaluating money printing by deficits through government consumption spending?

    Comment by dscott — February 27, 2014 @ 11:55 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.