May 2, 2014

Well Now, That Answers the Debate Over Whether Obama’s 2012 Reelection Was Legitimate

The answer is — it wasn’t (HT Instapundit):

Internal Emails: State Dept. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist Group

Excuse me while I emphasize that headline:

Internal Emails: State Dept. Immediately

Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist Group

A newly-released government email indicates that within hours of the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks on Americans in Benghazi, Libya; the State Department had already concluded with certainty that the Islamic militia terrorist group Ansar al Sharia was to blame.

The private, internal communication directly contradicts the message that President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice and White House press secretary Jay Carney repeated publicly over the course of the next several weeks.

They often maintained that an anti-Islamic YouTube video inspired a spontaneous demonstration that escalated into violence.

The email is entitled “Libya update from Beth Jones. ” Jones was then-Assistant Secretary of State to Hillary Clinton. According to the email, Jones spoke to Libya’s Ambassador at9:45am on Sept. 12, 2012 following the attacks.

“When [the Libyan Ambassador] said his government suspected that former Qaddafi regimeelements carried out the attacks, I told him the group that conducted the attacks—AnsarAl Sharia—is affiliated with Islamic extremists,” Jones reports in the email.

There is no uncertainty assigned to the assessment, which does not mention a video or a protest. The State Department provided the email to Congress in Aug. of 2013 under special conditions that it not be publicly released at that time. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) sought and received permission to release it Thursday.

“If the video was a cause, why did Beth Jones of the State Department tell the Libyan Ambassador that Ansar Al Sharia was responsible for the attack?” said Chaffetz.

Geez, since when does the Executive Branch get to dictate conditions not tied to immediate national security interests under which the information it releases can be made public?

We all know what should be done next, and we all know what won’t be done next.

Share

2 Comments

  1. Important:
    Lovell’s testimony is consistent with the September 12 e-mail from State Department official Beth Jones to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, including Cheryl Mills, that the Libyan ambassador was told Ansar al-Sharia was responsible. What has largely been overlooked is that hours earlier at 10:00 p.m. September 11, even before the attack was over, Mrs. Clinton sent out a press release directly linking the video to the Benghazi violence. While Mrs. Clinton statement was out of sync with the intelligence, it was reinforced three days later by the Ben Rhodes e-mail, which critics say attempted to shape the public discussion of a terrorist attack. Lovell testified the State Department did not respond quickly that night.-Herridge

    Comment by Jim — May 2, 2014 @ 10:42 am

  2. I take your comment to mean that State must have scrubbed or altered that press release from the official record, or has revised a release from how it was initially published. A link to (supposedly) all of Mrs. Clinton’s is here:

    http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2012/index.htm

    There are three statements related to the attack dated 9/11 and 9/12.

    The 9/11 statement current posted only refers to “inflammatory material posted on the Internet” — almost as if she doesn’t really know what it is:
    http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2012/09/197628.htm

    Comment by Tom — May 2, 2014 @ 2:05 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.