This open thread will stay at or near the top today. Rules are here. Possible comment fodder may follow. Other topics are also fair game.
The language he once was punished for speaking in school became Chester Nez’s primary weapon in World War II.
Before hundreds of men from the Navajo Nation became Code Talkers, Nez and 28 others were recruited to develop a code based on the then-unwritten Navajo language. Locked in a room for 13 weeks, they came up with an initial glossary of more than 200 terms using Navajo words for red soil, war chief, braided hair and hummingbird, for example, and an alphabet.
Nez never tired of telling the story to highlight his pride in having served his country and stress the importance of preserving the Navajo language. The 93-year-old died Wednesday morning of kidney failure with plenty of appearances still scheduled, said Judith Avila, who helped Nez publish his memoirs. He was the last of the original group of 29 Navajo Code Talkers.
“It’s one of the greatest parts of history that we used our own native language during World War II,” Nez told The Associated Press in 2009. “We’re very proud of it.”
Navajo President Ben Shelly ordered flags lowered across the reservation in honor of Nez from sunrise Thursday to sunset Sunday.
Nez was in 10th grade when he lied about his age to enlist in the U.S. Marine Corps not knowing he would become part of an elite group of Code Talkers. He wondered whether the code would work since the Japanese were skilled code breakers.
Few non-Navajos spoke the Navajo language, and even those who did couldn’t decipher the code. It proved impenetrable. The Navajos trained in radio communications were walking copies of it. Each message read aloud by a Code Talker immediately was destroyed.
“The Japanese did everything in their power to break the code but they never did,” Nez said in the AP interview. …
Go here for the rest of the story.
Revised 5 Times, NYT’s ‘Rush to Demonize Bergdahl’ Editorial Attacking GOP ‘Operatives’ and His Unit Is What Was Rushed
Apparently the seething anger at seeing the Obama administration being raked over the coals by critics of the Bowe Bergdahl exchange of five hardened terrorists for a soldier who left his post, including many Democrats and most prominently his fellow unit members, was too much for the editorial board at the New York Times. On Thursday, they let loose with a poorly sourced and hastily drafted editorial originally entitled “The Politics of the Bergdahl Case.” Tim Graham at NewsBusters alluded to this editorial on Friday in covering fake conservative David Brooks’s completely predictable defense of President Obama’s decision.
Several revisions later — five in all, tracked by an impressive site called NewsDiffs.org — there is a more pointed title (“The Rush to Demonize Sgt. Bergdahl”). The Times has also had to make two corrections, including an important qualification to a statement made by Arizona Senator John McCain which negated the Times’s attempt to go after him (of course, the Times pretended that it didn’t). The editorial went on to outrageously impugn the motives, integrity and basic decency of Bergdahl’s comrades in Afghanistan and sympathizers who have had the unmitigated gall to help them tell their story to the press.
This Month's Posts
|« May||Jul »|
- 2nd Amendment
- Bankruptcy & Reform
- Biz Weak
- Business Moves
- Consumer Outrage
- Corporate Outrage
- Health Care
- Life-Based News
- Lucid Links
- Money Tip of the Day
- MSM Biz/Other Bias
- MSM Biz/Other Ignorance
- National Security
- News from Other Sites
- OH-02 US House
- Ohio Economy
- Ohio Politics
- Privacy/ID Theft
- Quotes, Etc. of the Day
- Soc. Sec. & Retirement
- Stock Schlock
- Taxes & Government
- US & Allied Military
- Wide Open
Posting of comments is not immediate, and may take up to 24 hours.
Comment posting, as well as possible deletion, is
at the sole discretion of BizzyBlog.
Allowing a comment to be posted does not constitute agreement with it, or endorsement of it.