December 18, 2014

Fox’s Shepard Smith Hopes Cuba Relations Thaw Doesn’t ‘Ruin the Place’

Those who rail at Fox News for allegedly being a haven of unbridled, uninterrupted conservatism usually and conveniently fail to remember that Shepard Smith is there.

Smith’s take yesterday on the potential pitfalls of a thaw in U.S.-Cuba relations, particularly on the commercial front, was nothing short of astonishing. His primary fear, expressed in an interview with Gerri Willis of the Fox Business Network, is that the new arrangements might “ruin the place.” It would be “the last thing they need” to see “Taco Bell and Lowes” locations there. Smith also posed as a market analyst, wondering if the Dow was up 300 points because of President Obama’s related announcement. Video (HT Mediaite and PJ Media’s Ed Driscoll) and a transcript follow the jump:

Transcript (bolds are mine):

Shepard Smith: I think the last time I went [to Cuba], I brought back Cuban rum, Havana Club, Havana Gold, for like four dollars.

Gerri Willis: Did you now?

Smith: I think that’s what, I think that’s what it cost then. Maybe it was five dollars. But it wasn’t much more than that.

(At this point, there appears to be a skip in the video.)

Think of, the, think about how all of that will shift if this actually happens.

Willis: Well even today, Pepsico put out a statement saying how eager they are to get over there. So think about the onrush from American businesses if they open those doors wide, and I’m sure there’s going to be a ton of pressure now —

Smith: I’m sure there will.

Willis: — to make that happen.

Smith: You know the fear among anybody who’s ever been there or who cares at all about the Cuban people, as so many of us do, the last thing they need is a Taco Bell and a Lowe’s. I mean, we don’t need a —

Willis: (Laughs) Toilet paper, toothbrushes, right? Toothpaste.

Smith: That’s it. But y’know, it’s all one big idea and it all sort of comes together and, you wonder, are we about to get up in there and ruin that place?

Willis: Well, I think they’ve been held back for a long time.

Smith: They have.

Willis: Right. They want more, y’know, they need more stuff and basic stuff, certainly. It will be interesting to see how quickly that gets developed, too.

My big question, that becomes tourist destination Number One. It’s a stone’s throw from Florida.

Smith: Is the Dow loving this? The Dow is up 300 points today —

(end of video segment)

You’d expect Smith’s offensive concerns that capitalism might “ruin the place” to barely make the cut for airing at MSNBC, not Fox — at least based on the stereotypes about the network promulgated by the left. But Fox tends to be fair and balanced — even if the balance is, as in Smith’s case, quite unbalanced.

If Shepard Smith is looking for “ruin,” all he needs to do is look at Cuba’s slums — y’know, the crumbling sections of Havana and other cities which look more like war zones than places where people live their everyday lives. Tourists are almost never allowed to see them. Over 4-1/2 decades of tyrannical government by Fidel Castro followed during the past six years by his brother Raul are what have “ruined the place.”

Spare us your claim that you are among “anybody … who cares at all about the Cuban people,” Shep. If you really did, you wouldn’t be so spectacularly ignorant and fearful that genuine progress might “ruin the place.” It’s already largely in ruins — and, despite President Obama’s attempt at a unilateral thaw, it will likely remain that way until a representative from of government with a regime of true economic freedom arrives.

Mediaite made an unsolicited attempt to defend Smith:

We do feel it’s important to point out that in the segment before these remarks were made, Smith talked Cuba with Judge Andrew Napolitano and the pair had a lot of thoughtful things to say about how relaxed trade restrictions with the island nation would work. At the end of the segment, Smith suggested that, without question, more freedom is better, but that the speed at which you free people stuck in the 1950s could have ramifications.

I don’t find Mediaite’s attempted defense in any way redemptive. I don’t recall the Poles, East Germans, or the ordinary citizens of other East European countries were worried about the speed at which freedom arrived in the early 1990s.

Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org.

Share

3 Comments

  1. Why would Obama want to lift trade sanctions at this time unless it financially helped Cuba? Let’s review some facts so Obama’s actions here become obvious:

    - To paraphrase, Obama proclaimed 50 years of trade embargo didn’t reform Cuba. i.e. sanctions don’t work. If sanctions don’t work then why do we use them on Russia, Iran and the DPRK since Obama claims they do with these countries?

    - Cuba gets all it’s oil for free from Venezuela and right now with oil selling below $60/barrel, Venezuela is no longer in a position to finance free oil to Cuba.

    -Despite the Europeans who constantly flouted US trade sanctions, Cuba has not gotten any better with their treatment of its citizens. In other words, European trade/tourism helped the Castros stay in power by enabling them with hard currency.

    - Before Venezuela’s beneficence, Russia used to prop up the Cuban economy but Russia can’t help the Cubans either since their economy is funded by … oil, whose price is plummeting.

    - The only other sources of income for Cuba is European Tourism and Sugar Exports. Europe isn’t doing so well.

    - Cuba is Liberalism’s paradise on Earth (IF you believe Michael Moore), but a liberal paradise needs a subsidy to survive. If not Russia, not Venezuela, then whom? Diverting US tourism from Mexico to Cuba?

    Obama was forced to save Liberalism’s favorite lie, Cuba. If Obama doesn’t restore trade (i.e. US Tourist Dollars) to Cuba, the Castros will financially go belly up. Obama needs us to vacation in Cuba to save his favorite myth. That is the bottom line.

    Comment by dscott — December 18, 2014 @ 3:37 pm

  2. Why anyone thinks there’s a real business opportunity in Cuba as long as it’s a communist dictatorship is a mystery to me.

    Comment by Tom — December 18, 2014 @ 5:38 pm

  3. #1, Excellent points! People who think the embargo didn’t work are using a ridiculous standard to gauge it’s success. Namely that the Castro’s having been removed from power and Cuba being a democratic paradise. That was not really the point of it, the point was the make Castro’s power and influence much less, which it did. These people also ignore that both Europe and especially the Soviets propped up Castro for years, and once the Soviets fell, Venezuela then swept in. Could you imagine how destructive Cuba would be and would have been if the largest economy (US) had also been pumping in cash there? It’s truly scary to imagine.

    Also, if the embargo “didn’t work”, why the hell does anyone think lifting it and conceding to the Castro Bros will?

    #2, To be blunt, because they are idiots, useful and otherwise. The only business opportunity in Cuba is being fleeced by Fidel and Raul.

    Comment by zf — December 18, 2014 @ 7:30 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.