January 20, 2015

A ‘Statist of the Union’ Response From C.S. Lewis

Filed under: Activism,Economy,Education,Taxes & Government — Tom @ 11:17 pm

I got an email today suggesting that I post a one-hour video.

Usually, no matter how good it might be, I don’t do that without also posting excerpts for those who don’t have the time to get through a full hour.

When I indicated that to David Theroux of the Independent Institute, he pointed me to a transcript of that video, which effectively serves as a response to yet another “Statist of the Union” speech by President Barack Obama:

Key excerpts (bolds are mine; some paragraph breaks added by me):

… Throughout his work, Lewis infused an interconnected worldview that championed objective truth, moral ethics, natural law, literary excellence, reason, science, individual liberty, personal responsibility and virtue, and Christian theism. In so doing, he critiqued naturalism, reductionism, nihilism, positivism, scientism, historicism, collectivism, atheism, statism, coercive egalitarianism, militarism, welfarism, and dehumanization and tyranny of all forms.

Unlike “progressive” crusaders for predatory government power over the peaceful pursuits of innocent people, Lewis noted that “I do not like the pretensions of Government—the grounds on which it demands my obedience—to be pitched too high. I don’t like the medicine-man’s magical pretensions nor the Bourbon’s Divine Right. This is not solely because I disbelieve in magic and in Bossuet’s Politique. I believe in God, but I detest theocracy. For every Government consists of mere men and is, strictly viewed, a makeshift; if it adds to its commands ‘Thus saith the Lord,’ it lies, and lies dangerously.”

… “Of all tyrannies,” he stated,

a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth.

… Throughout his books, he defended the rights and sanctity of individuals against tyranny not just because he opposed evil, but because he considered a life in freedom—including both social and economic freedom—to be essential: “I believe a man is happier, and happy in a richer way, if he had “the freeborn mind.” But I doubt whether he can have this without economic independence, which the new society is abolishing. For economic independence allows an education not controlled by Government; and in adult life it is the man who needs, and asks, nothing of Government who can criticize its acts and snap his fingers at its ideology.”

…  (Rodney Stark has pointed out that although almost every other early culture and religion viewed human society in terms of the tribe, polis, or collective, “it is the individual who was the focus of Christian political thought, and this, in turn, explicitly shaped the views of later European political philosophers.” 

This focus produced a radical change in a world where, despite notable but limited exceptions of political decentralization, slavery and nearly universal and unyielding despotism had ruled, where people were treated as mere members of a group without rights. With Christianity, each and every person is “a child of God” or a holy object (res sacra homo) who has free will and is individually responsible for the choices he or she makes.

… As a proponent of natural law, Lewis was a supporter of the “law of equal liberty” but a firm critic of imposed egalitarianism for any reason. He further understood that egalitarianism is too often a cloak for envy (the sin of coveting) and that such appeals for regimentation are tyrannical

… Lewis understood that without this necessary natural-law framing of social, legal, and political culture, mankind would no longer be recognized as worthy of rights or even common decency, but instead would be left defenseless to any and all forms of oppression …

… Lewis fully understood that democracy, if unchecked, becomes egalitarianism and will trample on liberty as a collectivist force for evil by celebrating pride and envy as it fosters tyranny.

… recognizing the implications of every development in the galloping socialism of post–World War II England (Lewis wrote): “The modern State exists not to protect our rights but to do us good or make us good—anyway, to do something to us or to make us something. Hence the new name ‘leaders’ for those who were once “rulers.” … We are less their subjects than their wards, pupils, or domestic animals. There is nothing left of which we can say to them, ‘Mind your own business.’ Our whole lives are their business.”

Certainly damned near it.

NewsBusted (1/20/15)

Filed under: NewsBusted — Tom @ 3:57 pm

Here we go:

Topics:
– President Obama
– Paris Unity March
– John Kerry & James Taylor
– Josh Earnest and Radical Islam
– U.S. Capitol
– Plot to Poison Boehner
– Gitmo
– Boston Time Capsule
– Obama Marriage on the Rocks

Best Line: “According to the National Enquirer, Barack and Michelle Obama’s marriage is on the rocks. To give you an idea of how bad it is, their new Secret Service code names are ‘Bill’ and ‘Hillary.’”

Latest PJ Media Column (‘A Badly Needed Economics Lesson’) Is Up

It’s here.

It will go up at BizzyBlog.com Thursday afternoon (link won’t work until then) after the blackout expires.

The column promotes PJTV’s new series on Henry Hazlitt’s Timeless classic, “Economics in One Lesson.”

Andrea Tantaros of Fox’s ‘The Five’: Kerry Should Have Brought Judy Collins to Sing ‘Send in the Clowns’

On Fox News’s “The Five” last week, the panel had some fun coming up with alternative songs and performers U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry could have employed in his visit to France last week.

The video which follows starts with Greg Gutfeld exposing how the song used — “You’ve Got a Friend” as delivered by James Taylor, who was having a hard time even keeping his microphone properly positioned — actually served to expose the Obama administration’s kiss-and-make-up hypocrisy. When they got around to song ideas, Bob Beckel, the panel’s resident hardened liberal, was less than pleased, exposed his ignorance of France’s foreign policy positions, and even contended that “there shouldn’t have been a rally (in Paris) in the first place.” At clip’s end, Andrea Tantaros came up with the best song suggestion, which, sadly, could properly be applied to the person delivering tonight’s State of the Union speech.

(more…)

Poor Michael Moore: At NBC, ‘Sniper’ Supposedly ‘Ignites Debate About War Films’; Mentions Moore’s ‘Snipers Are Cowards’ Tweet and Failed Attempts to Back Away

The leftist presss is clearly having a problem with the runaway popularity of “American Sniper,” which just pulled in an estimated $105.3 million at the box office during the four-day holiay weekend.

Rather than just tell us that “Sniper” topped the charts this weekend and moving on to other matters, NBC’s Today Show chose to dwell on the film’s “message about war.” Sadly for one leftist “heavyweight,” the network exposed his hateful movie-relate passive-aggressive critique, even after he tried to back away from it yesterday.

Video:

Moore-related transcript:

… Over the weekend filmmaker Michael Moore tweeted: “My uncle killed by sniper in World War II. We were taught snipers were cowards. Will shoot you in the back. Snipers aren’t heroes.”

There was instant backlash. On Facebook, Moore insisted he wasn’t talking about the movie. But then he did talk about it, saying, “It’s too bad director Clint Eastwood had his characters calling Iraqis ‘savages’ throughout the film.” He also complimented an “awesome performance from Bradley Cooper,” and what he called an “antiwar sentiment expressed in the movie.”

Too late, Mike.

Everybody knows that you originally wanted us to think that you saw Chris Kyle as a coward. Nothing you say or do will ever change that.

Tuesday Off-Topic (Moderated) Open Thread (012015)

Filed under: Lucid Links — Tom @ 9:00 am

This open thread is meant for commenters to post on items either briefly noted below (if any) or otherwise not covered at this blog. Rules are here.

Positivity: Kelly Clarkson’s ‘Heartbeat Song’

Filed under: Life-Based News,Positivity — Tom @ 6:00 am

From Life News:

Kelly Clarkson’s New “Heartbeat Song” is Set to Beat of Her Unborn Baby’s Heartbeat

On Monday, new mom and pop/country superstar Kelly Clarkson released “Heartbeat Song” — an upbeat, synth-driven single that celebrates her new baby girl in a unique way.

“The beat is actually River’s heartbeat slowed down from when she was in my tummy!” shares Clarkson in a radio interview. Clarkson and her husband Brandon Blackstock, married in 2013, welcomed their baby girl River Rose into the world on June 12, 2014.

Released in its entirety on Monday, “Heartbeat Song” raves about her experience of motherhood …

The video: