April 2, 2015

At Memories Pizza, New Threats Arise; Press’s Determination to Ignore Them Continues (See Update)

Update, April 3: The Indiana man who claims to have been hacked now admits that he wasn’t, but says he was “joking” about robbing Memories Pizza, and is threatening to sue those who exposed his (ahem) public comments.

__________________________

Those of us following the Memories Pizza story won’t have trouble remembering it as the years go by, thanks only partially to the Walkerton, Indiana store’s fairly unusual name for a pizzeria.

What will also easy to recall are the “memories” of the unhinged and threatening leftist behavior that accompanied its owner’s simple statement that, if the request ever arose, they would have to turn down catering a same-sex “marriage” because participating in or supporting such a ceremony violates their firm Christian religious beliefs — and the press’s attempts to cover up what their journalistic malfeasance unleashed.

At last count, we had:

  • a tweeted wish to organize a group to burn the store down — a tweet described only as “mean” by the station responsible for the original ambush story.
  • a separate threat to the GoFundMe organizer who has a orchestrated a campaign which had raised over $379,000 for Memories as of 9:30 p.m. ET.
  • and, to top it off, another threat, by someone who now laughably claims he was hacked, to steal from the O’Connors the money that has been raised.

The tweeted threat to burn down the store has been around since Tuesday night, but its description by Aaron Ramey, the news director at ABC 57, the TV station whose ambush “what if” interview started all of this ugliness, is less well-known, and deserves further exposure:

Teacher suspended for mean tweet about pizza place who won’t cater gay weddings — AaronRamey (@adramey)

As a reminder, here’s that “mean” tweet:

MemoriesPizzaTweetedThreat040115

As RB Pundit noted, “A mean tweet is me saying you’re a moron. She was recruiting for arson.”

Ramey has since deleted his, well, moronic tweet.

Today, we learned that Lawrence B. Jones III, who along with talk radio host Dana Loesch launched and promoted the GoFundMe effort on behalf of Memories, has also received threats to himself — and his mom:

TweetedThreatsToGoFundMeMemories040215.png

Now that the GoFundMe campaign has been so wildly successful, the next “logical” step, if you reside in the leftist fever swamp, has to be to threaten to take the money raised.

An Indiana man is furiously backtracking from a tweet sent from his account, claiming that he was hacked. Apparently he has been able to delete that tweet before anyone took a shot of it. Sadly, for him, he can’t do anything about the hateful comment he posted on the GoFundMe comments page — because Chris Loesch, Dana’s husband, captured it:

TweetedThreatToRobMemoriesGoFundMe040215

That’s a specific threat to commit a crime — far from a trifling matter.

If any of this gets into the establishment press, I’ll be pleasantly surprised. We could use a pleasant surprise right about now. How about it, Associated Press? New York Times? Alphabet networks? Or is falsely portraying Christians as the ones who are hateful, bigoted violent hypocrites too important?

Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org.

Share

1 Comment

  1. I don’t understand why Mike Pence did such a bad job in defending common sense.

    The US has had a tradition of granting exceptions for conscientious objectors from the founding of the Republic. We allow men to be excused to not to fight in war if they are Quakers, Amish or others for religious grounds this is despite a national duty to do so. We allow medical personnel not to perform abortions based on religious objections. We allow people to not receive medical treatments and blood transfusions for religious objections. The SCOTUS recently ruled Hobby Lobby does NOT have to pay for abortions as part of their health insurance coverage due to religious objections. We have a long standing exemption for Churches to NOT hire homosexuals for any church related activity. We allow Churches NOT to marry gays in their buildings or by their clergy IF their religious beliefs dictate doing so is against their morality. The Courts have long recognized the exception of swearing in a witness for legal proceedings using the Bible OR using God’s name and are given the civil oath for both atheist and religious objectors.

    Why should anyone be forced to participate in an activity or provide a service for gays that they believe supports that activity they find morally objectionable? It’s not like any bakery won’t sell you a cake and then you buy a topper on the internet. Gays aren’t being prevented from doing their thing, but by the same token you shall not force people to do or sanction what they believe is abhorent and against their will.

    Comment by dscott — April 6, 2015 @ 8:31 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.