October 17, 2016

Hmm …

Filed under: Taxes & Government — Tom @ 1:18 pm

WaPo/ABC is exactly where it was three months ago (Clinton 47-43, Clinton +4).

Rasmussen, which had Clinton up 7 before the debate, now has her up by 2.

Meanwhile, that stubborn LA Times/USC poll still has Trump ahead by 1 (with virtually no black support, which is one of the key unpredictable wildcards in this election).

And it’s over because a bunch of polls which so obviously overweight Democrats and 2012 Obama voters show Hillary Clinton with a double-digit lead? With the Wikileaks news leaking (excuse the pun) into visibility because the press is trying to block its exposure, but can’t?

It is to laugh.



  1. Tom, just a quick question: considering all of this, what do you think of some conservative figures putting up every poll that shows Trump behind? Do you think they do more harm than good?

    Comment by zf — October 19, 2016 @ 5:17 am

  2. I think they a lot of them want to do harm, but as long as Rasmussen and LAT are showing it competitive, I don’t think it matters too much. I’m hoping it has the contrary danger of making Clintons overconfident or convinces their supporters that showing up is NBD.

    Comment by Tom — October 19, 2016 @ 8:44 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.