April 8, 2018

NY Times Op-Ed: ‘Chappaquiddick’ Is Not ‘Factual,’ Engages in ‘Character Assassination’

In a Friday New York Times op-ed, Neal Gabler, merely described as “writing a biography of Edward Kennedy” to feign neutrality, expressed alarm that “the despicable Kennedy” seen in Chappaquiddick “will eradicate the honorable if flawed real one.” Anyone who knows the history, dramatically retold in the movie I saw Sunday afternoon, can only hope that the actually despicable Massachusetts senator accurately portrayed in the film makes the history books.

Perhaps Gabler’s best-known previous perch was as an insufferably liberal panelist on Fox News Watch from 2002 through 2008.

Anyone who saw Gabler during that stint would imagine him completely capable of producing such an unhinged op-ed, featuring the following rants:

… despite the film’s advertisements claiming to tell the “untold true story” of a “cover-up,” the story has been told plenty, and no one but the most lunatic conspiracy theorists see this as anything but a tragic accident in which nothing much was covered up.

Many scenes cross from dramatic interpretation to outright character assassination. In this version, the Kennedy character leaves Kopechne to die as she gasps for air, and then, with the aid of his brothers’ old advisers, cooks up a scheme to salvage his presidential ambitions. A more callow, cunning, cowardly and self-interested yet moronic figure you couldn’t find.

As both the movie and the historical record show:

  • Kennedy did leave Kopechne to die as she gasped for air, and failed to contact the police for 9-10 hours, breaking his promise to Joe Gargan and Paul Markham that he would. He only did so after he learned that Kopechne’s body had been found. Even then, he went to the sheriff’s office in town and demanded that the sheriff come to him instead of visiting the accident scene, giving him and his attorney precious time to draft a blame-minimizing statement.
  • With the aid of his brothers’ old advisers, Kennedy indeed cooked up a sometimes clumsy (e.g., the neck brace he despicably wore, despite lack of any injury, to Kopechne’s funeral) but ultimately successful scheme which salvaged his Senate career and kept his pursuit of the presidency plausible.
  • And yes, Neal Gabler, it would be quite hard to find a person who acted in a more callow, cowardly and self-interested manner than Ted Kennedy did, with the help of his co-conspirators, from the Edgartown sheriff to high-level Washington insiders like Ted Sorenson and Robert McNamara, following and during the week after the accident.

Like the Boston Globe’s Ty Burr, whose Tuesday movie review I addressed in a Thursday NewsBusters post, Gabler never told readers that the producers of Chappaquiddick based the movie on the investigation’s 1969 inquest. That would have upset his dishonest, “fake history” narrative.

One more sentence from Gabler:

Contrary to the film’s implications, Mr. Kennedy immediately and forever after felt deep remorse and responsibility for the accident; it haunted him.

I guess that explains why Ted Kennedy named his dog Splash, and why he loved to hear Chappaquiddick jokes. (That’s sarcasm, folks.)

Cross-posted, with possible revisions, at NewsBusters.org.

Share

2 Comments

  1. Cowards who are cunning can be haunted and even feel remorse. But don’t confuse that with taking responsibility. “Moronic” describes the apologists for someone who should have served time in jail instead of the US Senate.

    Comment by Jim — April 9, 2018 @ 9:50 am

  2. Also:
    https://spectator.org/chappaquiddick-wasnt-the-only-scandal/

    Comment by Jim — April 9, 2018 @ 6:11 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.