November 16, 2015

Cruz Pushes Back Against Politifact ‘Fact-Checker’; Democratic Party IS Shrinking

In a Facebook post on Sunday, Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz pushed back against a “ridiculous” Politifact post which labeled his true claim that the Democratic Party is shrinking as “mostly false.”

Politifact’s Emma Hinchliffe had to go back 11 years to a now-irrelevant time period to unsuccessfully attempt to refute Cruz’s inconvenient truth, citing Gallup poll figures from 2004. Nobody cares about 2004, Emma. What Cruz said is that the party “is shrinking,” and it has been for the past 6-7 years, falling from 38 percent to 29 percent as Americans have seen how a Democratic President and his party have governed and behaved when in power.


Dartmouth’s Official Student Newspaper Downplays Ugly Black Lives Matter Library Protest

The Dartmouth calls itself “the student newspaper of Dartmouth College and the campus’s only daily,” and, begun in 1799, is America’s oldest college newspaper. It also appears to be a great training ground for journalists who write stories which bury and downplay the lede and cover up key facts when correctly prioritizing and presenting a story would make favored groups look bad.

The Dartmouth Review, whose website has been extraordinarily overloaded today, was founded in 1980 “to question stale academic orthodoxy and to preserve Dartmouth College’s unique liberal arts character.” Its alums include “Dinesh D’Souza, Laura Ingraham, The New Criterion‘s James Panero, Pulitzer Prize winner Joseph Rago of the Wall Street Journal … (and) others.” After a Thursday Black Lives Matter rally disrupting the quiet of Dartmouth’s Baker-Berry Library — an event which saw demonstraters threaten, harass and intimidate those who were doing what people ordinarily do in a library — The Dartmouth Review told its readers what actually happened. The Dartmouth’s Briana Tang buried multiple paragraphs of pablum which danced around what had obviously taken place towards the end of her insufferably long story.


November 14, 2015

Chad Henderson Walls Off Twitter Account After NewsBusters Criticizes His Tweet on GOP Candidates’ Readiness

We’ll have to live without Chad Henderson’s tweets for the time being. Once again, Henderson, as he did in 2013, has taken his Twitter account private, limiting it to “confirmed followers.” This time he likely did so in reaction to a NewsBusters post earlier this afternoon by P.J. Gladnick.

Henderson first gained notoriety during the initial Obamacare sign-up process in late 2013 when he claimed to have “enrolled” himself and his father when virtually no one else could even access the web site. The press unskeptically lapped up the Organizing for Action volunteer’s story until’s Peter Suderman shredded it. It turned out that Henderson had only set up a profile for himself and had not purchased any health care plan. Henderson resurfaced on Twitter after the Paris terrorist attacks yesterday, asking: “Do Trump, Rubio, and Carson have the experience and knowledge to prevent and react to a similar Paris attack? Not at all, folks.”


Salon Writer: Paris Terror Should End ‘(the) Right’s Violent Language Toward Activists’

As of 11 p.m. ET on Friday, according to CNN, the death toll was "at least 153" (since updated to "at least 128") who have been "killed in gunfire and blasts" in Paris in "coordinated attacks." CNN claims that "It is still not clear who is responsible." (Update: Early Saturday morning Eastern Time, ISIS claimed responsibility.)

Two days ago, leftist Democrat Hillary Clinton laughed at the idea of Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina being strangled. Today, we’ve learned that wealthy “liberal funders” are considering bankrolling the Black Lives Matter movement, whose followers have frequently been seen and heard targeting police with language like, “Pigs in a blanket, fry ‘em like bacon” and “What do we want? Dead cops!” But Salon’s Chauncey DeVega wants everyone to know that, after Paris, it’s the right in the U.S. which needs “to tone down their incessant violent rhetoric.”


November 11, 2015

Press Definition of ‘Joke’: Any Statement That Insults or Threatens a Republican or Conservative

Just as a reality check, I asked a friend today what his reaction would be if I said with a sincere-sounding voice that he makes me want to strangle him. He said, “Almost sounds like a threat.” I said, “No, it was supposed to be a joke.” He said, “No it’s not.”

I also asked another person what her reaction would be if I earnestly called her “demented.” She said, “You’d be insulting me.” I asked, “What if I said I was just joking?” Response: “I’d say, ‘The heck you were.’” In the past ten days, members of the press have decided that threatening language and an insult, both directed at GOP presidential candidate Carly Fiorina, were only “jokes.” There is virtually no chance that these same people would give the same treatment to threats and insults directed at Democrats and leftists.


November 10, 2015

Despite No Publicly Available Proof, Press Treats Mizzou Feces-Swastika Incident As Fact

Name the missing word in the following sentence from tonight’s Associated Press report on the current situation at the University of Missouri: “On Friday, the now-former chancellor issued an open letter decrying racism after a swastika smeared in feces was found in a campus dormitory.” The obviously missing word is “allegedly,” as in, “was allegedly found.” That word is also missing in sentences found in three separate reports at the New York Times. On October, 24, the Washington Post unskeptically accepted the recounting of the incident in a report shortly after it — ahem, allegedly — occurred.

There’s a really big problem here. Sean Davis at The Federalist was unable, after exhaustive efforts, to locate any evidence that the incident really took place. Additionally, he found that a photograph supposedly representing what was done has been present elsewhere on the Internet for a year. While Davis’s work doesn’t conclusively show that the incident is a hoax, it should be far more than enough to convince establishment press journalists with integrity covering events at the university to surrender their clearly expressed assumption that the incident actually occurred.


October 12, 2015

Carson Is Right: An Armed Populace Deters Tyrants; An Unarmed Populace Emboldens Them

Filed under: 2nd Amendment,Activism,Taxes & Government — Tom @ 9:19 am

That’s why they want to take citizens’ guns away.

Ben Carson is of course right when he says that an armed Jewish population would have made Hitler’s attempts to wipe them out more difficult.

What isn’t sufficiently appreciated is that “good intentions” made it easier for Hitler to first consolidate his power and then to undertake the Holocaust, as Stephen P. Halborrk wrote at National Review in December 2013 (bolds are mine):

How the Nazis Used Gun Control

… In 1931, Weimar (Republic) authorities discovered plans for a Nazi takeover in which Jews would be denied food and persons refusing to surrender their guns within 24 hours would be executed. They were written by Werner Best, a future Gestapo official. In reaction to such threats, the government authorized the registration of all firearms and the confiscation thereof, if required for “public safety.” The interior minister warned that the records must not fall into the hands of any extremist group.

In 1933, the ultimate extremist group, led by Adolf Hitler, seized power and used the records to identify, disarm, and attack political opponents and Jews. Constitutional rights were suspended, and mass searches for and seizures of guns and dissident publications ensued. Police revoked gun licenses of Social Democrats and others who were not “politically reliable.”

During the five years of repression that followed, society was “cleansed” by the National Socialist regime. Undesirables were placed in camps where labor made them “free,” and normal rights of citizenship were taken from Jews. The Gestapo banned independent gun clubs and arrested their leaders. Gestapo counsel Werner Best issued a directive to the police forbidding issuance of firearm permits to Jews.

In 1938, Hitler signed a new Gun Control Act. Now that many “enemies of the state” had been removed from society, some restrictions could be slightly liberalized, especially for Nazi Party members. But Jews were prohibited from working in the firearms industry, and .22 caliber hollow-point ammunition was banned.

The time had come to launch a decisive blow to the Jewish community, to render it defenseless so that its “ill-gotten” property could be redistributed as an entitlement to the German “Volk.” The German Jews were ordered to surrender all their weapons, and the police had the records on all who had registered them. Even those who gave up their weapons voluntarily were turned over to the Gestapo.

This took place in the weeks before what became known as the Night of the Broken Glass, or Kristallnacht, occurred in November 1938. That the Jews were disarmed before it, minimizing any risk of resistance, is the strongest evidence that the pogrom was planned in advance.

The other infamous tyrants of the 20th century also confiscated guns.

October 9, 2015

Attention Fairfield and Middletown (OH) School District Parents and Residents

Filed under: Activism,Education — Tom @ 9:06 am

You need to find out if the curriculum and topics described here are really being used in your school districts, which, according to the linked article, are on the client list of the organization involved:

‘Interrupting Whiteness’: National Education Conference to Blame White Teachers and Students for School Woes
Obama wanted “a national conversation on race.” This conference is what he meant: “interrupting whiteness” in American schools, “challenging white supremacy,” and eliminating the “white privilege” of Caucasian students.

The detail is even worse than the headline would indicate.

For now, it appears that nearby Northern Kentucky and Southeastern Indiana school districts have escaped this outrageous poison, which really constitutes both child abuse and teacher abuse.

October 8, 2015

Cass Sunstein’s ‘Just Embarrassing’ Revisionist Second Amendment History

Did you know that the “The Gun Lobby Rewrote the Second Amendment”?

No, really. Even though not a single word contained in that amendment has changed in over 220 years, you should believe it because former Obama administration official Cass Sunstein said so at Bloomberg View on Wednesday.


October 7, 2015

Positivity: Roseburg grandma’s gun shop gives all profits to homeless charity

Filed under: 2nd Amendment,Activism,Positivity — Tom @ 6:00 am

From Roseburg, Oregon:

10:17 a.m. PDT October 5, 2015

While the killing power of firearms is inevitably the focus in the wake of tragedies such as the mass shooting at Oregon’s Umpqua Community College, 86-year-old Carolyn Kellim is living proof that, in the right hands, guns also can contribute to acts of kindness.

Kellim is a white-haired grandmother who runs KC’s Exchange gun shop out of her home in a quiet residential neighborhood in Roseburg, Oregon.

But she donates all the profits from her business to Casa de Belen, a local charity that provides transitional housing for homeless families with adolescents and homeless teens.

“I’m doing the best I can to make as much money as I can to give to a charity that works with kids and families,” Kellim told NBC News, standing behind the counter in her one-room shop crammed with rifles, handguns, ammunition and hunting accessories.

“That’s so important in today’s world. We have to take care of people that have had a bad luck stroke.” …

Go here for the rest of the story.

October 5, 2015

Not News: Obama’s Planned Visit to Roseburg, Ore. ‘Not Welcome’ There

Items found at the Associated Press, the New York Times and the Washington Post, in reporting that President Obama plans to visit Roseburg, Oregon later this week, have all failed to report that community leaders have said that his visit is not welcome.

The 4:10 p.m. PT (7:10 PM ET) entry at a running timeline at AP announced that “Barack Obama will travel to Oregon this week to visit privately with families of the victims of last week’s shooting at a community college.” None of the four previous items in the timeline as of 9:00 PM ET tonight (saved here for future reference) mentions that town leaders, who believe they are appropriately expressing the community’s sentiments, would prefer that he stay away.


Salon Writer Calls Michelle Malkin a ‘Right-Wing Rage Monkey’

Filed under: 2nd Amendment,Activism,Taxes & Government — Tom @ 3:57 pm

Poor Gary Legum at How dare supporters of the right to keep and bear arms as clearly defined in the Constitution’s Second Amendment push back against the gun control movement’s cynical exploitation of Thursday’s Roseburg, Oregon massacre?

Legum is outraged that “The right tells us (again) to ignore the elephant in the room.” He must mean the fact that the area in question at Umpqua Community College was a “posted” gun-free zone with only unarmed security guards, right? Of course not. Legum is upset over Americans’ “irrational attachment … to weaponry” — so upset that he descended into profanity and name-calling that would likely end his career forever if he were a right-wing commentator.


September 24, 2015

Veteran AP Reporter Promotes Absurd ‘Laissez Faire Regulation’ Myth

The competition for the most annoying aspect of establishment press business reporting is fierce. One which immediately identifies a reporter as hopelessly biased and ignorant is any reference to “laissez faire” as a condition allegedly present in any modern economy anywhere on earth.

“Laissez faire” is an economic concept involving “an economic system in which transactions between private parties are free from government interference such as regulations, privileges, tariffs, and subsidies.” There are no true “laissez faire” economies of any meaningful size, because they are all regulated to some extent. As we will see shortly, some in the press even employ the obviously absurd term “laissez faire regulation.”


September 2, 2015

Positivity: What to learn at the World Meeting of Families: The family is a gift from God

Filed under: Activism,Positivity — Tom @ 6:00 am

From Vatican City:

Aug 30, 2015 / 10:37 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The World Meeting of Families event next month in Philadelphia aims to lead families to know their importance as a gift from God and to help them open their hearts to Jesus Christ, a priest involved in the event has said.

The family “is the place where we feel most loved, most protected, most safe, valued,” Father William Donovan, one of the meeting’s main organizers, told CNA. “In the natural economy of things, one could say after the gift of life itself, the second greatest gift God has given us is family.”

“The reason is because, once God gives us life, he also wants us to have a full life. He wants us to be loved, to be protected, to be safe, to be secure, to be valued,” said the Archdiocese of Philadelphia priest who also serves as Archbishop Charles Chaput’s liaison to the Pontifical Council for the Family.

This year’s World Meeting of Families will take place from September 22-27 with the theme “Love is Our Mission: The Family Fully Alive.” Its closing Mass with Pope Francis will mark the end of his first visit to the United States. The meeting also includes presentations, testimonies, and other events.

“The idea is that we want to try to bring as many resources and assistance to the human family so that they can understand and execute its role as a place of love,” said Fr. Donovan.

Pope John Paul II founded the international event in 1994 to encourage families and to strengthen familial bonds. The event takes place every three years in a different city around the world. …

“>Go here for the rest of the story.

August 31, 2015

Press Fawns Over ‘Black Lives Matter’ Rally, Ignores 20K ‘All Lives Matter’ March

On Saturday, “more than 20,000” people — perhaps as many as 25,000 to 30,000, according to some police — marched through the streets of Birmingham, Alabama at a Glenn Beck-led “Restoring Unity” rally chanting “All Lives Matter.” The event has been described as possibly “the largest march in Birmingham since the civil rights marches of 1963.”

Searches at Google News and at the Associated Press’s main national and “Big Story” sites indicate that no establishment press outlet gave the rally national coverage. The AP only managed to push out terse three-paragraph and seven-paragraph local stories. Meanwhile, a Reuters story on the less than peaceful march by the “Black Lives Matter” crowd attended by an estimated 325 (compared to an expected 900) in Minneapolis was carried at Yahoo News and the New York Times (at least).