September 26, 2014

Green Hypocrisy, Exposed by the Blaze

Filed under: Activism,Economy,Environment,Taxes & Government — Tom @ 8:13 pm

Amy Holmes utters a great potential headline during this presentation — “Lifestyles of the Clean and Famous,” except, of course, they’re not really clean:

These folks would surely exempt themselves from any legal restrictions to be imposed on the rest of us.

September 21, 2014

NYT, AP Ignore Large Contingent of Socialists and Far-Leftists in NYC Climate March

At Tea Party and conservative events, the press routinely seeks out any shred of evidence of far-right extremism, racism or even uncivil behavior exhibited by attendees. If found, it then tries to portray even one or a few such people out of thousands as somehow typical.

Rallies in support of liberals’ pet causes get a completely different treatment. The press almost invariably ignores rampant left-wing extremism clearly on display. Sunday’s “Climate March” in New York City, along with other smaller marches in other parts of the world, exemplifies the blatant double standard. The Blaze, Gateway Pundit, and others reported no shortage of Gotham protesters often uncivilly advocating an end to capitalism and its replacement with “a socialist future.” The Associated Press and the New York Times ignored it all.

(more…)

September 16, 2014

Passages of the Day: On ‘Climate Change’

Filed under: Economy,Environment,Scams,Taxes & Government — Tom @ 6:47 am

From the New York Post:

Oregon-based physicist Gordon Fulks sums it up well: “CO2 is said to be responsible for global warming that is not occurring, for accelerated sea-level rise that is not occurring, for net glacial and sea ice melt that is not occurring . . . and for increasing extreme weather that is not occurring.”

Al Gore was right in one respect: Climate change is a moral issue — but that’s because there is nothing quite so immoral as well-fed, well-housed Westerners assuaging their consciences by wasting huge amounts of money on futile anti-global-warming policies, using money that could instead go to improve living standards in developing countries.

It’s all a bunch of globaloney.

September 6, 2014

WSJ: Whatever Happened to Global Warming? (Answer: There Hasn’t Been Any For at Least 15-19 Years)

Matt Ridley, at the Wall Street Journal on Thursday (bolds are mine):

Whatever Happened to Global Warming?
Now come climate scientists’ implausible explanations for why the ‘hiatus’ has passed the 15-year mark.

On Sept. 23 the United Nations will host a party for world leaders in New York to pledge urgent action against climate change. Yet leaders from China, India and Germany have already announced that they won’t attend the summit and others are likely to follow, leaving President Obama looking a bit lonely. Could it be that they no longer regard it as an urgent threat that some time later in this century the air may get a bit warmer?

In effect, this is all that’s left of the global-warming emergency the U.N. declared in its first report on the subject in 1990. The U.N. no longer claims that there will be dangerous or rapid climate change in the next two decades. Last September, between the second and final draft of its fifth assessment report, the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change quietly downgraded the warming it expected in the 30 years following 1995, to about 0.5 degrees Celsius from 0.7 (or, in Fahrenheit, to about 0.9 degrees, from 1.3).

Even that is likely to be too high. The climate-research establishment has finally admitted openly what skeptic scientists have been saying for nearly a decade: Global warming has stopped since shortly before this century began.

First the climate-research establishment denied that a pause existed, noting that if there was a pause, it would invalidate their theories. Now they say there is a pause (or “hiatus”), but that it doesn’t after all invalidate their theories.

Alas, their explanations have made their predicament worse by implying that man-made climate change is so slow and tentative that it can be easily overwhelmed by natural variation in temperature—a possibility that they had previously all but ruled out.

In other words, even if man is contributing to “global warming,” Mother Nature compensates, and makes that contribution irrelevant.

So please explain why we’re supposed to revise the entire (largely, or at least when successful) capitalism-based world order in favor of a one-world government-managed carbon tax, carbon-trading, and wealth redistribution scheme? The “scientists” have just so much as admitted that none of it is necessary, because it wouldn’t accomplish anything meaningful.

The answer is that “global warming” aka “climate change” aka “climate disruption” has been a computer model-driven, media-assisted hoax oblivious to reality. Its credibility has been highly suspect since at least since the turn of the century, and is now in tatters.

And the “pause,” by some estimates, is closer to 19 years.

August 30, 2014

Arctic Ice Cap Expands by 41 Percent in Two Years; Al Gore Thought It Might Be Gone by Now

Ice, ice baby. That’s what they have a lot more of in the Arctic.

The UK Daily Mail, one of those British tabloids the left has despised going back to the Clinton administration and its paranoia about a right-wing media conspiracy, reports from authoritative sources — the kind the U.S. establishment press uses when it seems to support the hoax known as human-caused global warming — that the Arctic ice cap has expanded rapidly in the past two years. In doing so, it has made up all of what was lost between 2009 and 2012 with a slight margin to spare. Seven years ago, former Vice President and leading global warming false alarmist Al Gore predicted that “It could be completely gone.” Excerpts follow the jump (bolds are mine):

(more…)

July 31, 2014

CNN’s Bill Weir Directs Profanity at Fox Nation Tweeters Mocking Mild Weather at a ‘Climate Change’ Meeting

Filed under: Economy,Environment — Tom @ 2:50 pm

You might think that an anchor at an also-ran news network in the cable ratings race would be trying to learn about and adapt to what Number 1 is doing to draw its far larger audience.

That’s what happens in virtually every other business: If your competitors start outperforming you, you try to respond and then one-up them in some way. There are two major exceptions. One involves businesses protected by cronyism, which instead try to drive out competitors through government regulations and political favors (e.g., the established taxi companies trying to stop Uber). The other is the liberal wing (i.e., most of) the national news business. Their response is to keep doing what they’ve been doing all along, while bitterly attacking those who are taking away their business and their audience. As an example, let’s look at this still present tweet from CNN Anchor Bill Weir (profane word actually present in the original tweet was massaged; HT Mediaite):

(more…)

June 30, 2014

Imagine That: 45 Days After Predicted ‘Irreversible Collapse,’ Antarctic Sea Ice Sets New Record

Hank Paulson, whose claim to fame in the public sector is panicking and browbeating the nation and its Washington politicians into accepting the Troubled Asset Relief Program in late September 2008, and who just two weeks later “put a (figurative) gun to the heads” of large-bank CEOs to “persuade” them to accept federal “investment” in their enterprises, has re-emerged to tell us, according to the Hill, that “Republicans are ‘ready for a serious discussion’ on climate change.”

As a reminder, in 2007, the late Robert Novak wrote that Paulson “contributed to Bill Clinton in 1992, Democrat Bill Bradley’s 2000 presidential campaign, the feminist Emily’s List and Wall Street’s favorite Democrat, Chuck Schumer,” before financially supporting George W. Bush in 2004. Paulson was also “regarded in his own administration as less a true Republican secretary than a transition to the next Democratic Treasury.” One of Paulson’s current assertions parrots global warming alarmists’ claims in mid-May that that a serious and supposedly irreversible collapse of Antarctic Sea ice will catastrophically raise worldwide sea levels. Over the weekend, meteorologist Joe Bastardi, Chief Forecaster at WeatherBell Analytics LLC, relayed some very inconvenient data (bolds are mine):

(more…)

NYT: Scientists ‘Startled’ at Great Lakes’ Rise; Another Warmist Prediction Is Biting the Dust

UPDATE: Long-time commenter Gary Hall has provided a link to a chart with 95 years of Great Lakes temperature data.

______________________________________

An undated but clearly recent page at the National Wildlife Federation breathlessly warns readers, in a section entitled “Threats from Global Warming,” that “Lake Erie water levels, already below average, could drop 4-5 feet by the end of this century, significantly altering shoreline habitat.” A Thursday Huffington Post Canada Business entry observed that “the (Great Lakes) basin has experienced the longest extended period of lower water levels since the U.S. and Canada began tracking levels in 1918.” Of course, it’s because of “climate change.”

Friday, Julie Bosman at the New York Times reported (HT Powerline) that “The International Joint Commission, a group with members from the United States and Canada that advises on water resources, completed a five-year study in April 2013 concluding that water levels in the lakes were likely to drop even farther, in part because of the lack of precipitation in recent years brought on by climate change.” But the reason Bosman was on the story is because — fortunately for area residents, but unfortunately for “startled” global warming adherents claiming to be “scientists” — Great Lakes sea levels are rising again (bolds are mine throughout this post):
(more…)

June 28, 2014

As Wind Farm Gets Permit to Kill Eagles, AP’s Scott Smith Claims Wind Energy Has ‘Exploded’ Under Obama

In a Thursday evening writeup about how the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will allow a California wind farm to “become the first in the nation to avoid prosecution if eagles are injured or die when they run into the giant turning blades,” reporter Scott Smith at the Associated Press, aka the Administration’s Press, took a big gulp of his hi-test White House koolaid and wrote: “Under President Barack Obama, wind energy has exploded as a pollution-free energy source that can help reduce the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.”

As we approach 18 years of no global warming, poor Scott probably has no idea, after decades of effort and tens of billions of dollars in tax credits and other subsidies, how insignificant wind energy remains in the grand scheme of U.S. energy production. So let’s help him.

(more…)

June 3, 2014

Politico Pair Produces 5,900 Words of Puff on ‘Less in Control’ Obama; All Scandals Except HealthCare.gov Go Unmentioned

For evidence that no one looking for objective reporting should seriously consider reading output from the Politico, look no further than the 5,900-word puff piece propagated by Carrie Budoff Brown and Jennifer Epstein on Sunday.

Their “Special Report: The Obama Paradox” told readers what that President Obama supposedly “recognizes that he is less in control of the Washington agenda than ever in his presidency — a reality that has left him deeply frustrated at times.” Meanwhile, the EPA is going wild with carbon regs in the name of the “climate change” hoax, federal regulators are harassing banks and their customers who operating legal businesses in Operation Choke Point, and immigration policy has been unilaterally hijacked. And in a final irony, as the Politico pair were putting their handiwork to bed, Obama was conducting a prisoner swap — one soldier whose loyalties are questionable for five hardened terrorists — while violating a law requiring him to notify Congress of what he was going. “Less in control” my foot. Instead, we are seeing usurpation of authority by Obama and his executive branch.

(more…)

May 30, 2014

Latest PJ Media Column (‘Too Rolling Stoned’) Is Up

It’s here.

It will go up here at BizzyBlog on Sunday morning (link won’t work until then) after the blackout expires.

April 28, 2014

Press Ignores Harvard Prof Alleging ‘Astonishing Interference’ in Latest IPCC Global Warming Report

Professor Robert N. Stavins at Harvard’s Kennedy School hardly seems like a major climate change/global warming boat-rocker. At his blog last year, he described climate change as “the ultimate global commons problem,” where “international, if not global, cooperation is essential.” Commenting on climate talks in Doha, Qatar, in December 2012, he saw the role of the Harvard Project on Climate Agreements as helping countries and international bodies “address climate change in ways that are scientifically sound, economically rational, and politically pragmatic.”

So Stavins is no “denier,” as enviros on the left are given to calling anyone who dares to question climate change dogma. But he strongly objects to how his role in the latest IPCC report relating to how countries might co-operate to reduce carbon emissions — basically where the rubber meets the road in affecting everyday citizens’ lives — was compromised by intense political interference. Excerpts from the UK Daily Mail’s coverage, once again an instance of the UK tabloids scooping the U.S. press, follow the jump (bolds are mine throughout this post):

(more…)

At Politico, David Nather’s Cliven Bundy Guilt-By-Association Game Blows Up

Politico’s David Nather must have thought he was so clever. Here’s how he opened a recent column: “It can happen to anyone, right? You rally behind a guy … and suddenly he’s spewing racist bile and boy, does it splash on your face.” Yes, I left out a few words, and I’ll get to that. But before providing them, the quote just rendered would apply to how those at Los Angeles branch of the NAACP must feel about their now-withdrawn but not forgotten plan to confer a lifetime achievement award on Los Angeles Clippers’ owner Donald Sterling, who has been caught on tape allegedly telling a woman that she shouldn’t “associate with black people” or have blacks accompany her to Clippers games.

Let’s revise Nather’s blather a bit for another comic circumstance: “It can happen to anyone, right? You rally behind a guy because he comes over to your side on climate change, and suddenly he’s arrested in ‘a 20-count federal indictment that includes charges of mail fraud, wire fraud and tax fraud.’ Boy, does it splash on your face.” Now I’m talking about the fools at Organizing For Action, who celebrated the “breakthrough” of having GOP Congressman Michael Grimm come over to their side mere days before his indictment, which occurred today. These two far more damning examples demonstrate what a fool Nather was Thursday evening as he tried to tar Republicans who were expressing single-issue sympathy for Cliven Bundy in his ongoing battle with Uncle Sam’s Bureau of Land Management with Bundy’s later race-based remarks (bolds are mine):

(more…)

April 27, 2014

Grimm News: OFA Touts Climate Change ‘Breakthrough’: A Republican Congressman About to Be Indicted

A Friday afternoon email I received from Organizing For Action, aka BarackObama.com, aka the group whose mission in life is to support whatever President Obama wants them to support, took me by surprise.

The email, which is replicated at an OFA post, told readers that “There’s one fewer climate change denier in Congress.” I figured that the congressman who flipped almost had to be a Republican, and I was right: “Congressman Michael Grimm (NY-11) is standing up for an honest and reality-based discussion on what to do about climate change.” I also thought to myself that something else must be going here. Is it ever. I hope OFA didn’t spend too much on party favors for what it described as a “breakthrough,” because they happen to be cheering the “conversion” of a guy who is about to be indicted:

(more…)

April 19, 2014

AP Howler: Admin’s Good Friday Timing of Latest Keystone Pipeline Delay a ‘Surprise’

It either doesn’t take much to surprise Josh Lederman and Dana Capiello at the Associated Press, aka the Administration’s Press, or they have very short memories.

The AP pair described the Obama State Department’s Friday afternoon statement (roughly 3:30 p.m., based on the “9 hours ago” result returned in a Google search on the document’s title at 12:30 a.m. ET) that it would “provide more time” for eight federal agencies involved to submit “their views on the proposed Keystone Pipeline Project” as a “a surprise announcement Friday as Washington was winding down for Easter.” It’s as if something like this has never happened before during the Obama administration. Well, yes it has.

(more…)