It will go up here at BizzyBlog on Thursday morning (link won’t work until then) after the blackout expires.
The column covers some ground which may be familiar to longtime readers here, namely the Wall Street Journal’s decades-long dedication to the horribly dangerous idea that “There shall be open borders.” But it deserves to be refreshed, given that almost everyone in Wasington seems ready to sell out on illegal-immigrant amnesty at the first perceived safe opportunity.
Bill O’Reilly’s opening talking points on his show tonight went after President Obama’s claim that the intelligence community underestimated and did not adequately communicate the dangers of ISIS/ISIL in Iraq and Syria with both barrels.
As documented in several NewsBusters posts in the 48-plus hours since Obama's Sunday night "60 Minutes" interview, the rest of the press has been mostly working furiously to downplay the intelligence community’s outrage at being thrown under the bus. O’Reilly’s no-holds-barred analysis assessment, as seen in the video which follows the jump, is a stark contrast to what has been seen on other broadcast networks:
On Sunday, Trip Gabriel at the New York Times had the thankless task of concocting a report which would somehow make Ohio Democrats feel positive about winning at least one statewide office in November instead of getting skunked, which appears pretty likely at this point.
That’s because the campaign of the Dems’ gubernatorial candidate, affectionately known as the Wreck That Is Edward FitzGerald, has imploded over the fact that FitzGerald, a former FBI agent, somehow managed to drive without a valid permanent license for ten years. In the course of carrying out her mission — one she should have chosen not to accept — Gabriel made three errors. Two of them involve failing to check out two not-credible claims by Democrats. A third involves a basic fact about Ohio’s electoral offices. Two of the three really require Times corrections. We’ll see if they are forthcoming.
During the third quarter, Fox News, which has been routinely walloping its cable-news competition for years, was “the most-watched (network during) primetime across all of cable in more than a decade — even besting USA and ESPN.”
So says the Hollywood Reporter, which also gets the award for the most delicious (or is it really the most truthful?) typo of the day:
Steve Kroft’s interview of Barack Obama was the focus of this past Sunday’s episode of “60 Minutes” on CBS. It has become noteworthy primarily because of Obama’s statement that U.S. intelligence agencies “underestimated what had been taking place in Syria.” As several previous NewsBusters posts have shown (examples here, here, here, and here), the press is working mightily to minimize how the intelligence community and the Pentagon are pushing back, hotly disputing the President’s assertion.
Another noteworthy development is that the network’s audience for the Obama interview was down 69 percent in the 18-49 demographic from the show’s previous episode. The vast majority of press reports noting the ratings slide, as compiled by Kristinn Taylor over at Gateway Pundit, are not mentioning that it was essentially Obama’s show.
A number of center-right and New Media outlets have noted Politico Magazine’s disingenuousness in the opening photograph in its “Race and the Modern GOP” article.
At the item’s top is the iconic “Stand in the Schoolhouse Door” photo showing onetime segregationist Alabama Governor George Wallace “try(ing) to block the entry of two black students” into the University of Alabama. The aforementioned article title appears beneath the words “History Dept.” The magazine is clearly trying to lead anyone not old enough to remember or anyone unfamiliar with U.S. history to believe that Wallace, who ran for president as a Democrat in 1964 and 1976 and as an Independent in 1968 and 1972, was a Republican. The writeup by Doug McAdam and Karen Kloos waits a dozen mostly long paragraphs before finally tagging Wallace as a Democrat.
Insights from Roger Simon, on nominally intelligent friends and acquaintances who are choosing to be only selectively informed, and therefore over time have become functionally uninformed:
Now these are likable people who are decent or better to friends and family, but they are monumentally square and unsophisticated. They grew up up in an environment where certain, now highly old-fashioned, liberal views not only were cool, they were the veritable given, donnée as the French would say, of their society, so they are constitutionally unable to reexamine them. Change is difficult for all of us. Few achieve any kind of growth. But we are surrounded by a generation of people whose ideas are stuck in 1968, though most of them were just little kids at the time and too young to participate. Nevertheless, being stuck, they are loathe to see what is going on around them. They are terrified of it, lest they suffer from alienation of friends and family, loss of work, even personality disintegration. So they watch MSNBC and nod when some reactionary nitwit says the decapitation in Oklahoma was nothing more than “workplace violence” when the perpetrator had converted to Islam in prison only months before and posted beheadings to his Facebook page.
These people remind me of Jews — many of them are Jews, sadly — who would be saying that we should be understanding and negotiating with the Germans at the very moment they were being summarily marched into the gas chamber at Auschwitz. Too strong? No, it’s not. The liberals we know and love, most of them anyway, aren’t bad people. They’re just so scared of what’s happening they can’t think.
ABC’s Jonathan Karl is on a tear — and his editorial bosses at ABC seem determined to ignore him.
As Scott Whitlock at NewsBusters noted earlier today, Karl on Friday “grilled White House press secretary Josh Earnest … about claims that al Qaeda had been ‘decimated,’” mainly because it hasn’t been. Instead, it seems like there are at least ten times as many versions. The network televised none of the exchange. Tonight, NB’s Curtis Houck wrote that ABC was among the networks which ignored how “several sources in the intelligence community disputed President Obama’s comments” about how they had supposedly underestimated the ISIS/ISIL threat. It turns out that ABC was silent even though Karl wrote a scathing column this afternoon which named specific names (bolds are mine):
Early voting in Ohio was supposed to start tomorrow, a full 35 days before Election Day. But today, the U.S. Supreme Court, by a 5-4 majority, allowed the state to carry out voting law as passed by the legislature instead of what a group of misnamed “civil rights” groups wanted.
The final paragraph of Ann Sanner’s Associated Press coverage of the ruling illustrated how absurd this controversy has become. It related to the lower court ruling the Supremes reversed, and showed that to so many members of the press and public, world history apparently started less than a decade ago.
Democratic State Representative Christina Ayala has been arrested and charged with 19 felony charges of voter fraud. Eight of the counts are for fraudulent voting. Other Ayala family members are under investigation, and criminal charges have been recommended but not made against one of them.
The press is letting Connecticut’s Secretary of State claim that the Ayala prosecution proves that the Nutmeg State’s elections system works, even though the charges go back to elections held as far back as five years ago. Why are we supposed to be impressed?
According to a poll which is described as the state’s “gold standard,” Republican U.S. Senate candidate Joni Ernst now leads Bruce Braley, her Democratic Party opponent, in the Iowa U.S. Senate race for the seat being vacated by Democrat Tom Harkin.
The Des Moines Register’s “Iowa poll” has Ernst up by a six-point margin, 44% – 38%. That Ernst’s lead isn’t larger is apparently attributable to a statement she made to the Register’s editorial board which has been treated as a misstep, but really wasn’t. The truth is that the statement Ernst made — that she had “reason to believe there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq” — really wasn’t strong enough.
As I noted Sunday evening, Fox News’s Megyn Kelly, on her Friday show, characterized the beheading of Colleen Hufford at the hands of Alton Nolen, if true, as “the first American beheading on American soil reportedly in the name of jihad.”
It turns out that someone allegedly tried to beat Nolen out for that distinction, and failed. Take a look at what the Oklahoman’s Nolan Clay described as a “bizarre coincidence” in a Friday report (HT Ed Driscoll; excerpted nearly in full because of the story’s importance and the paper’s subscription wall; bolds and numbered tags are mine):
National Journal’s Ron Fournier was apparently among those who endured President Obama's appearance on "60 Minutes" this evening.
Fournier was able to succinctly summarize the contents of Obama's interview with Steve Kroft, the network's designated softball pitcher, in a tweet appearing shortly after its conclusion (HT Twitchy):
The story of alleged Moore, Oklahoma murderer Alton Nolen, who reportedly beheaded co-worker Colleen Hufford, is fading from the headlines. Barring further developments, I don’t expect it to be a news topic on any of the Big Three networks’ morning or evening news shows tomorrow.
That’s because it has already disappeared from prominence at the Associated Press. At 10:20 this morning, the latest story on Nolen had already dropped to Number 6 on the AP’s top list of U.S. stories. By 5:30 p.m., it was gone. The top story at 5:30 was oh so predictably about Ferguson, Missouri. The “big news”: a police officer was shot in the arm, and “was treated and released from a hospital.”
During the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman saga, the press was widely and deservedly criticized for repeatedly and almost exclusively using a photo of Martin as an innocent-looking 13 year-old over others more recently taken which were readily available.
Perhaps they’re at it again with alleged murderer Alton Nolen. On Saturday morning, the Associated Press described Nolen as having “beheaded a woman with a knife and was attacking another worker when he was shot and wounded by a company official.” Photos of Nolen from 2013, 2011 and 2010 have accompanied press reports, while the one which will be seen after the jump from Nolen’s own Facebbook page just three weeks ago has been absent (HT to an emailer):